On Saturday, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that aims to make English the official language of the United States, a move that has broad implications but which may not be constitutional.
The order tries to justify the action by saying “our Nation’s historic governing documents, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, have all been written in English.” Notably, neither of those documents mentions the English language, nor legal power by presidents to make such a decree.
“This order designates English as the official language of the United States,” states the document signed by Trump on March 1.
In addition to that action, the order rescinds a previous executive action issued by former President Bill Clinton, which required federal agencies to accommodate people who don’t speak English by offering them interpreters or documents in their primary language. Although Trump’s order doesn’t bar such accommodations, it leaves it to federal agency heads to “make decisions as they deem necessary to fulfill their respective agencies’ mission and efficiently provide Government services to the American people.”
In other words, federal agencies are now allowed to deny these accommodations at their discretion — a policy that will undoubtedly hurt non-English-speaking immigrants attempting to gain citizenship or temporary status to reside in the U.S.
At least one portion of the executive order signed by Trump could be legally dubious. No provision within Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which deals with the powers of the presidency, allows a chief executive to make an order unilaterally declaring the country’s official language.
Ofer Raban, professor of law and Elmer Sahlstrom Senior Fellow in Trial Law at the University of Oregon School of Law, discussed Trump’s probable reasoning in an email to Truthout.
“Executive orders derive their legal authority either from a federal statute or from the President’s constitutional powers,” Raban said. “Since Congress failed to enact a statute making English the official language of the United States—despite several such legislative attempts — President Trump’s declaration appears to rely on his constitutional authority (including his authority over federal executive agencies).”
More than 67 million people in the U.S. speak a language other than English in their homes, amounting to around one in five households. Census data has also indicated that around 350 languages are spoken within the U.S.
Many countries around the world do have official languages, as do dozens of U.S. states. However, several countries do not, including the United Kingdom, where the English language originated.
Critics lambasted Trump’s order, saying it was aimed at stoking division and activating his anti-immigrant base.
“This is just more anti-immigration sentiment from him to stoke division and to feed some red meat to his MAGA base,” said MSNBC’s Katie Phang.
“Trump is trying to send the message that if you’re not white, rich and speak English you don’t belong here,” said Anabel Mendoza, communications director for United We Dream. “Let me be clear: Immigrants are here to stay. No matter how hard Trump tries, he can’t erase us.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.