If former President Donald Trump wins the presidential election in November, he may appoint as attorney general a federal judge who has helped him stave off dozens of charges relating to his improper removal of classified White House documents.
According to a report from ABC News, which cited several sources with knowledge of the situation, Trump’s transition team is considering federal Judge Aileen Cannon — who oversaw the classified documents case involving Trump for over a year until she dismissed it this past summer — to become his attorney general if he wins the presidential election. ABC News was able to view the list of potential candidates, which placed Cannon’s name as second out of a dozen choices.
It’s not uncommon for presidents to select former or even current federal judges to take on that role — current Attorney General Merrick Garland, for example, was still serving as a federal judge before he was appointed by President Joe Biden to serve in his cabinet. But selecting a judge who has had a direct hand in a case involving a president would be rare, if not unprecedented, and an extreme conflict of interest for both, especially considering that the judge rendered rulings in the former president’s favor.
Many legal experts expressed confusion over Cannon’s decision to toss out Trump’s classified documents case, in which she agreed with the former president’s lawyers over their novel arguments that the Department of Justice (DOJ) improperly appointed Jack Smith to be special counsel in the case. Smith’s office is currently in the process of appealing that decision.
Even before that decision, Cannon entertained a number of the Trump legal team’s requests for delays in the case, some of which were appealed and overturned by higher courts.
Cannon has also engaged in ethically questionable behavior, including attending a conservative legal junket in May, just two months before she ordered the classified documents case to be dropped. She did not disclose her attendance at the event publicly, in violation of a judiciary rule that was established nearly two decades ago.
Several commentators lashed out at the idea of Cannon being considered for a role in the Trump administration after rendering several rulings and actions in his favor.
“Judge Aileen Cannon delayed Trump’s trial past the election and ran out the clock for him. She protected Trump every step of the way. She attacked Jack Smith and smeared his role as unconstitutional. Now Trump is considering making her Attorney General. Can you say QUID PRO QUO?!” said political strategist Lindy Li on the social media site X.
Trump’s consideration of Cannon “should be grounds for IMMEDIATE investigation,” legal commentator Tristan Snell said.
The X account for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) also suggested that the classified documents case against Trump should now resume without Cannon.
“Now that Judge Aileen Cannon is reportedly being considered as a potential attorney general in a second Trump administration, it’s even clearer that she can never be impartial in the classified documents case,” CREW said. “She must be removed.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.