The head of the General Services Administration (GSA), Emily Murphy, announced in a letter to President-elect Joe Biden on Monday that she would allow him and his team to begin the formal process of transitioning into the White House. But less than one day after that announcement was made, statements from President Donald Trump indicated he was not yet done raising questionable challenges to the 2020 presidential election results.
Biden was declared the winner of the election on November 7 by a number of media outlets citing election returns from several states, which demonstrated an insurmountable lead for Biden over Trump in both the Electoral College and popular vote totals. Despite widespread recognition of Biden’s win, Trump has waged challenges to the results on several fronts, engaging in lawsuits claiming dubious and unproven allegations of fraud while also seeking recounts in states with close election returns.
Murphy had faced sharp criticism over the past several weeks for her refusal to allow the transition process for a Biden administration to begin. Without a formal recognition of his win, the president-elect’s incoming administration was barred from having access to federal government resources that would allow for a smoother transition .
The head of the GSA made the formal announcement on Monday, recommending that the transition begin. “I have determined that you may access the post-election resources and services,” Murphy wrote in her letter to Biden.
Murphy maintained that she was “never directly or indirectly pressured by any Executive Branch official” to delay the transition process, and came to the decision “independently” to reach out to Biden. That contradicts somewhat what Trump wrote on Monday, however, where he said on Twitter that he was “recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols” for a transition, implying perhaps that his permission was needed before Murphy could proceed.
Later on Monday night, shortly after the decision from Murphy was announced, Biden’s transition website was up and running, with the URL of buildbackbetter.gov, a reference to the theme of his presidential campaign.
While the transition process has formally begun, Trump himself has not yet given up on continuing to contest the outcome of the race, and by Tuesday morning he was resuming his false and unsubstantiated claims of fraud.
Trump, for example, shared a poll on his Twitter account that demonstrated 79 percent of his supporters believed the election was “stolen” from him.
“They are 100% correct,” Trump tweeted out, “but we are fighting hard. Our big lawsuit, which spells out in great detail all of the ballot fraud and more, will soon be filled [sic]. RIGGED ELECTION!”
It’s unclear what new allegations of ballot fraud Trump is planning to share, and it’s unlikely that anything at this point will demonstrate any evidence of the malfeasance he claims exists. Most of Trump’s legal team’s claims of fraud have fallen flat before judges in both state and federal courtrooms, and the vast majority of the complaints have been dismissed as being baseless and without proof.
While the numbers Trump shared in his tweet were from a legitimate poll, they only focused on the views of his supporters, and not of Americans overall. Other polling data has shown that a majority of the electorate view the election as being fair and conducted without widespread fraud.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll from last week, for example, found that 55 percent of American voters felt the outcome was “legitimate and accurate.” Only 28 percent of those in the poll said the opposite.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.