One day after revelations that he had viewed coronavirus as a “deadly” disease as early as February, President Trump demanded schools still engaged in virtual learning to return to in-person instruction.
Trump suggested on Thursday morning that the motivation for schools to conduct virtual classes was political, driven primarily by Democratic lawmakers. He also suggested that schools which didn’t return to an in-person format should face financial penalties.
“Democrats, OPEN THE SCHOOLS (SAFELY), NOW!” Trump tweeted. “When schools are closed, let the money follow the child (FAMILY). Why should schools be paid when they are closed? They shouldn’t!”
However, recommendations made earlier this year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on how to restart in-person instruction (such as keeping students apart from one another, wearing masks, and other social distancing suggestions) were previously rejected by the president, deemed by him as being too costly and burdensome.
The tweets from Trump came just one day after a number of interviews between him and journalist Bob Woodward revealed he had viewed coronavirus as harmful in early February.
In comparing it to the flu, Trump explained to Woodward that the disease was more worrisome.
“You know, people don’t realize, we lose 25,000, 30,000 people a year here. Who would ever think that, right?” Trump said at the time.
“This is more deadly” than the flu, he added.
Weeks later, on March 19, the president also admitted to Woodward he preferred to minimize the severity of the disease in his public comments.
“I wanted to always play it down,” Trump said.
Trump even conceded to Woodward that the disease could cause harm to young people.
Many school districts across the country are trying to determine whether it is feasible to reopen their doors and offer in-person instruction, or if it’s too dangerous to do so within their communities, opting to teach online instead to limit the spread of COVID-19. These determinations are especially important to make, particularly in light of research published just last month that suggests children played a bigger role than originally thought in spreading the disease.
The president has limited control over federal funding for public schools. An analysis from The New York Times in July found that 90 percent of all budgets nationwide came from local sources.
Still, for schools that depend heavily on federal funding, Trump’s threats are not completely empty, and could pressure some districts to make decisions prioritizing economic concerns instead of public health.
Americans are, for the most part, opposed to the kinds of threats Trump made toward schools that are doing virtual learning. When he made similar threats in July, polling demonstrated that 65 percent of Americans were against reducing federal funding for schools choosing to go online, while only 22 percent said federal funding should be cut.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy