A bevy of recent polling data suggests that voters are split on which candidate they would prefer in the 2024 presidential election when faced with a potential race between Democratic incumbent President Joe Biden and former president and likely Republican nominee Donald Trump.
As of Monday morning, an aggregate of polling data from RealClearPolitics shows that Biden is leading Trump by just 0.4 percent. That’s well within the margin of error — indeed, in nine of the last 10 polls shared to the site, the two are statistically tied.
Although the election is still more than a year away, the data is worrying some Democrats, who fear that a close race will benefit Trump when it comes to the Electoral College.
Conventional wisdom suggests that Republicans generally outperform Democrats in the Electoral College, even when the electorate is nearly evenly split — in 2016, for example, Trump won the presidency in spite of losing the popular vote by around two million votes to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. In 2020, though Trump lost to Biden by around seven million votes overall, he was within 45,000 votes in three different swing states of being re-elected through the Electoral College.
But experts have been challenging the prevailing wisdom that Trump will perform better in the Electoral College than Biden, even if the final vote count is split.
According to an analysis from The New York Times’s chief political analyst Nate Cohn, Trump’s advantage in a “close race” Electoral College scenario is dwindling. Cohn cites the fact that Biden is faring “as well or better” than Trump in nationwide polling of battleground states.
“At this point, another large Trump Electoral College advantage cannot be assumed,” Cohn wrote in a column published on Monday. “At the very least, tied national polls today don’t mean Mr. Trump leads in the states likeliest to decide the presidency.”
There are numerous indications that Trump’s advantage in this respect is fading, Cohn said. In the 2022 midterms, which Republicans won only by a narrow margin (despite widespread predictions of a substantial “red wave”), most Republican gains came from states that didn’t see much competition, whereas the expected 2024 battleground states saw closer results.
“Republicans showed their greatest strengths in noncompetitive states like California and New York as well as across much of the South, including newly noncompetitive Florida,” Cohn said. But in places like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, the results differ vastly from those in 2020.
Cohn also pointed out that polling in these and other battleground states tends to show Biden faring better than Trump. In a New York Times/Siena poll published last month, for instance, Biden led Trump by just two points. In the battlegrounds, meanwhile, the incumbent president led the GOP candidate by double that amount.
There are other indicators that suggest the election will be close, but more difficult for Trump to win than Biden. The mere fact that Biden is the incumbent president gives him an automatic advantage — only two incumbents in the past 30 years (Trump being one of them) have failed to be re-elected. Only 10 incumbent presidents in U.S. history have failed to win the presidency for a second term.
Notably, favorability ratings don’t have to be perfect for a president to be re-elected — months before their respective re-election campaigns, both former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, who went on to win their contests, were in the low-40s range — and Biden’s current numbers (41 percent favorable, 55 percent unfavorable in one recent poll) appear to be just slightly better than Trump’s (40 percent favorable, 58 percent unfavorable).
The issues that the 2024 general election will center on will also likely benefit Biden. On abortion, Social Security and Medicare, LGBTQ rights, and other issues, Biden’s views are more closely aligned with the American public than Trump’s are.
The 2024 election campaign is still several months from taking off, and numerous factors could alter the paths of the two leading candidates within the next year. But conventional wisdom from past elections — that a close race will boost Trump’s chances in the Electoral College — no longer seems relevant.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 98 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy