Women represent 72 percent of all workers in tipped-wage jobs – those with a federal minimum wage of just $2.13 an hour. That means that women are disproportionately placed in the very compromising position of their having to please customers and impress employers in order to earn enough tips to have decent take-home pay.
Too often, that means enduring sexual harassment.
Thirty-seven percent of all sexual harassment reports filed at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) come from women in the restaurant industry, making it the single largest source of sexual harassment claims in the United States.
“It’s a demeaning situation to be in when you earn $2.13 an hour as a woman and you are completely reliant on customers’ largess, off the mercy of the clientele,” said Saru Jayaraman, co-founder and co-director of Restaurant Opportunities Center, an organization dedicated to protecting workers’ rights and wages.
Earlier this year, the Feminist Wire published Jennifer McGreevey’s account of her experience as a young New York City waitress in a restaurant owned by a man whose “specific treatment of the waitresses was based upon their willingness to respond to his flirtations.”
“It took me only a week to realize that part of my job included allowing myself to be a victim of sexual harassment,” she wrote.
After several weeks of tolerating the abuse, she argued back against her boss – and was summarily fired. She wrote that she felt that she had no recourse. “I was supposed to take my tip-dependent salary, my aching waitress feet, and the memories of faking a smile through days and nights of constant sexual harassment, served with your spinach pie or chicken kebab, and sit in a corner and be quiet about it.”
Fortunately, the EEOC has had some recent success in prosecuting sexual harassment claims. In March 2014, the organization settled on behalf of Dorothy Hannah and other female workers previously employed at Ricardo’s Restaurant Inc. of Pennsylvania. The establishment agreed to pay $20,000 after its co-owner was charged with making frequent comments of a “crude or sexual nature” and touching his female employees in a sexual manner.
This victory came shortly after another EEOC suit was announced against Red Lobster, a popular subsidiary of Darden Restaurants Inc., the world’s largest full-service restaurant company. Filed in September of 2013, the suit quotes consistent “pervasive sexual misconduct” by a male Red Lobster manager, who grabbed, groped, and pressed his groin against female employees. The decision in this case is still outstanding.
The attitude at the root of such a high prevalence of sexual harassment in the restaurant service industry is abhorrent, but predictable. It is based on the misguided presumption that a tip is extra, and should only be awarded for extraordinary work. But, too frequently, a tip is neither extra nor enough.
We have Herman Cain, the 2012 Republican presidential candidate of Tea Party fame and the “9-9-9 plan,” to thank for that. In 1996, Cain negotiated a deal as CEO of the National Restaurant Association that allowed for a moderate increase to the full minimum wage, as long as the tipped minimum wage remained unchanged indefinitely. And it has.
By law, companies are required to “top up” their employees’ wages if their pay (subminimum wage plus tips) does not meet the full minimum wage set by the state or the federal government. But this rarely happens. Between 2010 and 2012, the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor conducted approximately 9,000 investigations in the service sector of the restaurant industry and found an 84 percent noncompliance rate with this rule. Because discussion of the subminimum wage is often buried under discussion of the full minimum wage, these issues, including sexual harassment and wage theft, are just not considered.
The existence of the tipped minimum wage is a loophole that allows restaurants to underpay their employees, 40 percent of whom are mothers. And it is disrupting America’s economic growth. Sixteen percent of tipped workers rely on food stamps to feed their families. That is more than twice the rate of the rest of the general U.S. workforce.
Thirty-two states, including the District of Columbia, require employers to pay their tipped workers more than the federally mandated $2.13. But, except in seven states that do not allow for one, the tipped minimum wage is significantly less than the full minimum wage for non-tipped work. And 19 states still abide by the inadequate and outdated $2.13 figure.
Republicans have blocked every attempt to increase both the full and tipped minimum wage increase during the current session of Congress. In response to Congressional obstruction, President Obama signed an executive order in February of this year increasing the full and tipped minimum wages of federal contractors to $10.10 and $4.90 an hour, respectively. While the limited scope of the executive order is disappointing, it is an encouraging signal that the real-life implications of such low wages are a concern to this administration.
Although the prospects may seem bleak for broader action on the minimum wage, Jayaraman remains optimistic. “There are moneyed forces that have controlled our system, but there is nothing that the people cannot achieve once they expose those forces and once they resist.”
As we advance further into the 21st century, women are being held back under an antiquated wage law that leaves them vulnerable to abuse. No one can survive on the subminimum wage. Not women. Not men. Not families. And no one deserves to try to.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.