In Washington, “health care reform” has degenerated into a sick joke.
At this point, only spinners who’ve succumbed to their own vertigo could use the word “robust” to describe the public option in the health care bill that the House Democratic leadership has sent to the floor.
“A main argument was that a public plan would save people money,” The New York Times has noted. But the insurance industry – claiming to want a level playing field – has gotten the Obama administration to bulldoze the plan. “After House Democratic leaders unveiled their health care bill [on October 29], the Congressional Budget Office said the public plan would cost more than private plans and only 6 million people would sign up.”
At its best, “the public option” was a weak remedy for the disastrous ailments of the health care system in the United States. But whatever virtues the public option may have offered were stripped from the bill en route to the House floor.
What remains is a Rube Goldberg contraption that will launch this country into a new phase of health care apartheid.
People who scrape together enough money to buy health insurance will discover that they’re riding in the back of the nation’s health care bus. The most “affordable” policies will be the ones with the highest deductibles and the worst coverage.
We’re hearing that large numbers of lower-income Americans will be provided with Medicaid coverage in the next decade. Translation: If funding holds up, they’ll get to hang onto a bottom rung of the health care ladder. Many will not be able to get the medical help they need, from primary care providers or specialists.
Not long ago, we were told that the Obama administration was aiming for a public option that could provide coverage to one out of every four Americans. Now the figure is around one out of every fifty.
Not long ago, the idea was that taxpayer-funded subsidies were to be used only for the public option. But now the entire concept has been hijacked by and for the private insurance industry. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it on October 8, private insurance companies “are going to get 50 million new consumers, many of them subsidized by the taxpayers.”
Pelosi was making the argument that the least the insurance industry could do, in return, would be to accept a higher level of taxation. But her comment was a telling acknowledgment that all the “public option” proposals now provide a massive funnel from the US Treasury to the insurance conglomerates. The individual mandate is a monumental giveaway to private insurance firms.
The specter of “health care reform” that requires individuals to stretch their personal finances for often abysmal insurance coverage is the worst of all worlds – government intrusion for corporate benefit without any guarantees of decent health coverage.
In effect, the individual-mandate requirement tells people that obtaining health coverage is ultimately their own responsibility – and the quality of the coverage is beside the point. In essence, when it comes to guaranteeing quality health care for all, the gist of the policy is: “Let’s not, and say we did.”
The predictable result is reinforcement of vast – and often deadly – inequities in access to health care.
With Washington making such a corporate mess of “health care reform,” the best way to get what we need – health care for all as a human right – will be to enact single-payer health care in one state after another.
But the House Democratic leadership has not been content to serve up a grimly pathetic “health care reform” bill. Speaker Pelosi has used her political leverage to quash Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s amendment – approved months ago by the Education and Labor Committee – that would grant waivers so that states could create their own single-payer system. Pelosi removed the Kucinich amendment from the House bill.
The California legislature has twice passed a strong single-payer bill, both times vetoed by the state’s current execrable governor. The official position of the California Democratic Party is unequivocally in favor of single-payer health care. And yet, Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, did what she could to sabotage the single-payer position of her own party in her own state.
Sickening.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.