August 15 holds a special place in the memory of many people. This year’s anniversary marked the 68th year since the historic V-J (Victory over Japan) Day for some and Independence Day for others. But it also marked 68 years of suffering for a group of women who, now in their late 70s or early 80s, continuously seek compensation and apology from Japan.
From 1932 to 1945, as many as 200,000 women were “recruited” from Korea, China, Indonesia and other parts of Asia (including Japan) to “comfort” Japanese soldiers as sex slaves. Koreans, whose country was colonized by Japan, were easily targeted, making up 51.8 percent of the victims. Thirty-six percent were from China.
This issue of the so-called “comfort women” – a debatable term, according to some activists – is a hot topic largely in Asia and within international human rights communities. In July 2013, however, it aroused the city of Glendale in southern California, when the city officials decided to install the “Peace Monument.”
When the news of the bronze monument of a teenaged girl wearing Korean traditional hanbok got around, the response was quick. Many Japanese-Americans protested this installation, sending emails against the “phony propaganda” and taking to the streets of the city that praised prostitution. Such furious outcry mirrored how Japanese hardliners reacted when the first Peace Monument was installed in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, South Korea.
Of course, not all Japanese or Japanese Americans share the same opinion. In 2007, California’s Rep. Mike Honda drafted a resolution that got unanimous support from his peers asking the Japanese government to apologize and acknowledge a part of its history. Kathy Masaoka, cochair of Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress, is another Japanese American who sides with Rep. Honda. In mainland Japan, much beloved anime producer Miyazaki Hayao also has openly expressed his concern with the issue.
Nonetheless, backed by its nationalistic citizens, the Japanese government denies any related charges. Japan’s Prime Minister Abe Shinzo also insisted no documents proved that these women were trafficked, reversing previous official statements from the government that acknowledged the issue, but failed to procure compensation. (Korean victims do not recognize the Asia Women’s Fund, a volunteer-led fundraiser, as government-issued compensation.)
Twenty years of weekly protests by the “comfort women” and their supporters and the United Nations’ recommendation did little to change such attitudes.
But the issue means more than strained international relations among some Asian countries or a group of people dwelling in the past. This is a serious war crime that has remained unresolved for almost 70 years, for which everyone as a global citizen should feel a sense of guilt and take responsibility. However it is defined – a systematized mass rape or a forced prostitution, the case of “comfort women” must be resolved to stop present-day “comfort women” from suffering in war zones such as Sudan and Congo.
A 2010 study on “elderly German women who experienced wartime rapes” found an unsurprising result of posttraumatic stress leaving a lasting impact on victims’ lives. The writers conclude, “as far as World War II trauma is concerned, there is an urgent need for treatment programs” for the elderly generation. But how much can the treatments heal when the actual event remains largely unacknowledged, haunting the survivors to this day?
Many of these women have deceased. The few remaining ones are growing old. The clock is ticking for these women. But so it is, for everyone else.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.