Hundreds of immigrant rights advocates from around the country converged on the Texas Capitol on Memorial Day to protest the state’s new anti-sanctuary law, Senate Bill 4. Protestors lined the galleries on the legislature’s final day and chanted, “Hey ho, hey ho, SB4 has got to go,” disrupting the proceedings until they were removed by state troopers.
The bill, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) on May 7, is the crest of a wave of state laws spreading throughout the South that prohibit local governments from passing so-called “sanctuary policies” — local ordinances that limit police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
Texas’ SB4 is the harshest and most sweeping anti-sanctuary law yet, creating a litany of new rules around immigration enforcement. The law also introduces punishments for local governments found to be non-compliant with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or other federal immigration officers, including:
- Fines of up to $25,500 per day.
- Removal of a person holding elective or appointive office.
- Charging sheriffs, chiefs of police, or constables with a class A misdemeanor, which can carry up to a year in prison and a $4,000 fine.
- Allowing law enforcement officers to ask people they detain about their immigration status.
Critics have compared the provision allowing police to ask about citizenship status to Arizona’s 2010 “show me your papers” law, which was largely struck down in the courts. Arizona’s law required police to ask for immigration papers if they suspected someone was in the country without documentation, whereas Texas’ law only gives police the ability to ask rather than requiring it.
Police chiefs across Texas, including interim Dallas Chief David Pughes and Houston Chief Art Acevedo, say SB4 will hurt public safety by eroding trust between immigrant communities and the police.
According to a Facing South analysis of statewide sanctuary bans, the first anti-sanctuary bill was passed in 2008 in Missouri, the only state outside of the South to pass such a measure. Georgia and Tennessee followed suit in 2009, trailed by Alabama, South Carolina, North Carolina, Mississippi, and now Texas.
These laws are part of an ongoing strategy of conservative Southern states preempting local ordinances coming out the region’s increasingly progressive cities, a tactic made infamous by North Carolina’s HB2 “bathroom bill.”
In Texas, SB4 is set to go into effect on Sept. 1, though it will have to clear mounting legal hurdles before then. The border town of El Cenizo was the first to file a lawsuit, joined by the League of United Latin American Citizens, Maverick County, and the ACLU. The suit claims SB4 violates several constitutional protections, including the sovereign rights of local governments and due process requirements.
El Paso County is also suing over the law. This week, Austin and San Antonio became the first major cities to file suit, with discussions about legal action also underway in Dallas.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.