Delivering a huge blow to President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the way the administration sought to end a popular program allowing Dreamers (undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children) to remain in the country had not followed the proper steps, thus resulting in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to remain in place for the time being.
The 5-4 decision of the Court stated that the Trump administration had not adhered to the protocols established by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Because those steps hadn’t been followed, DACA was not ended in a proper way, and thus, from a legal standpoint, remained in place, allowing nearly 650,000 Dreamers to stay in the country without threat of deportation for now.
Joining the four liberal justices of the Court, Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion for the case.
Although the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under Trump ended the program in September 2017, the agency “failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients,” in violation of the APA, Roberts said. “That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner.”
“The appropriate recourse is therefore to remand to DHS so that it may consider the problem anew,” Roberts added.
Pamela Chomba, director of State Immigration Campaigns at FWD.us, celebrated the ruling on social media.
“I still can’t believe today’s #DACA decision. I’m crying tears of joy, I’m relieved, I feel lighter,” Chomba said.
But the ruling, while giving Dreamers a huge victory for now, also grants the administration the ability to end DACA if it goes through the proper steps to do so, a point that Chomba also recognized in her tweet.
“There’s still so much to do. Real justice we need to fight for,” Chomba said.
Dreamers themselves also seemed to recognize the legal victory was bittersweet, and potentially temporary.
“Trump could choose to rescind this program tomorrow,” one DACA recipient said to CNN. “He knows how to do it. The Supreme Court is telling him. So we are not safe.”
Started in 2012 under the administration of President Barack Obama, the program gave qualified individuals who came to the U.S. as children, but who had not obtained documents to become citizens, the right to remain in the country without the threat of being deported, allowing them to work legally and apply for college loans. The program allowed recipients to renew their eligibility every two years.
The program is popular, even among lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Yet, on two separate occasions, when Democrats and Republicans in Congress announced they had reached a deal to keep the program in place, Trump surprised GOP lawmakers by saying he wouldn’t support those proposals.
Although Trump may now attempt to end the program through the proper steps outlined by Roberts and the majority of the Supreme Court, it may be politically advantageous for him not to do so. With the presidential election coming up in the fall, in addition to the widespread support among the American populace to grant citizenship rights outright to Dreamers, any attempts at dismantling the program at this time could hurt Trump significantly as he tries to win a second term in office.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.