Adorned in a freshly-ironed dress and satchel for her books, Ruby Bridges, age six, walked past an angry mob and into the doors of William Frantz Elementary School. The girl’s father was initially reluctant to let his daughter become the school’s first African American student, but her mother felt strongly that the move was needed not only to give her daughter a better education but rather to “take this step forward for all African American children.”
That was the spring of 1960.
Ruby Bridges is now age 57. As she and her peers, who were some of the youngest activists of America’s civil rights movement, begin to consider retirement, they are once again confronting another struggle for economic equality.
America’s looming retirement security crisis disproportionately affects African Americans, an alarming number of whom are retiring in poverty after a lifetime of work.
Half Are Economically Insecure
More than half of African American retirees are economically insecure because of low income, high housing and health care costs, according to a 2011 study from the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University, in Waltham, Mass.
The researchers found that over half (52 percent) of African-American and 56 percent of Latino seniors are economically insecure.
And, says the Brandeis study, a staggering 83 percent of African American seniors have insufficient assets to last throughout their remaining years.
All this is on top of today’s double-digit unemployment, underemployment and the predatory subprime mortgage scheme that targeted minorities and stripped families of their future gains in household wealth.
Last month an analysis of black and Latino retirement from the Center for Labor Research and Education at the University of California, Berkeley, revealed that poverty rates are twice as high among blacks and Latinos elders, each at about 19 percent, compared to the overall senior U.S. population at 9.4 percent.
The retirement-security crisis is a problem for current retirees, who grapple with the decision of whether to pay their rent or buy medicine. It is also a problem for their adult children, who often help pay their living expenses.
This threat of deepening poverty, driven by the economic downturn, inadequacies in Social Security and personal savings, and the erosion of traditional pensions in the private sector, looms for current workers, too.
A growing number of ethnic workers are less likely to be prepared for retirement.
The UC Berkeley study shows that fewer than a third of employed Latinos and less than half of black workers are covered by an employer sponsored retirement plan, a critical resource in ensuring adequate retirement income. As a result, they are disproportionately reliant on the limited income provided by Social Security.
African Americans tend to have lower earnings and household income, as well as higher unemployment than white workers. Research shows ethnic families also tend to have fewer long-term assets and carry more debt than their white counter parts.
Solutions Both Economic and Racial
Although resolving these issues is critical to delivering economic equality to minority families, finding solutions to ensure retirement security is a racial as well as an economic justice imperative for all Americans.
Experts agree that providing more sensible retirement options to today’s workforce and reinforcing supports for current retirees will make Americans less vulnerable to poverty in their golden years.
For instance, last November, the Commission to Modernize Social Security, a coalition of organizations representing multicultural elders, published its report, Plan for a New Future: The Impact of Social Security Reform on People of Color.
During a recent webinar on the report, one commission member, Wilhelmina Leigh, of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, ion Washington, D.C., noted that blacks and Latinos today have little or no retirement savings. Average Social Security retirement benefits, she said, are only about $1,200 per month, and often less for elders of color. In addition, she said, seven in 10 older African Americans and Hispanics have merely $25,000 or less in savings.
Unfortunately, lawmakers beholden to Wall Street CEOs have proposed “reforms” to state and local pensions around the country that reduce retirement security for public workers.
Armed with heavy rhetoric, these lawmakers have waged war on traditional pensions by demonizing public-sector workers. The typical “greedy” public employee whose pension they have slashed in some states and hope to cut in others is actually an African American father, who diligently rides on the back of a city garbage truck to provide a modest, decent living for his family.
A 2010 study of public-sector workers by Hye Jin Rho of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C., stated that policymakers “must not overlook the fact that a large share of public sector workers are in physically strenuous jobs.”
Rho showed, for example, that “almost half (47.5 percent) of local government employees between ages 55 to 65 held difficult jobs—physically demanding jobs or jobs with difficult working conditions—in 2009.”
War Waged on Social Security
These lawmakers and their allies have also waged war on Social Security by making false claims that it is failing. They’ve called for cuts to the program, such as by raising the retirement age to 69 or 70, increases that would shrink retirement income for low-income seniors, especially ethnic elders, even further.
But Social Security continues to be solvent. Social Security may face shortfalls 25 years from now, however, projected shortfalls can be eliminated if the program is reformed to ensure the wealthy pay their fair share into the system.
These sources of modest retirement income have successfully kept many retirees out of poverty. Social Security lifts 13 million elderly out of poverty while 4.6 million seniors would be classified as poor or near poor without their modest pension income.
It’s hard to believe that it was only 52 years ago when Ruby Bridges entered the hallways of William Frantz Elementary School and it’s hard to imagine how many of her peers will retire in poverty.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.