Skip to content Skip to footer

States Sue Trump Over Executive Order Halting Trans Health Care Funds

“The order is a cruel and baseless broadside against transgender youth,” the lawsuit says.

Supporters of transgender youth demonstrate outside Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) on February 6, 2025 in the wake of US President Donald Trump's executive order threatening to pull federal funding from healthcare providers who offer gender-affirming care to children.

Three Democratic-led states — Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota — and three doctors filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Friday, challenging its anti-trans order that targets gender-affirming care for transgender youth.

Last month, Trump signed an executive order threatening to block federal funding for hospitals that offer gender-affirming care for transgender youth under the age of 19. Although LGBTQ advocates have emphasized that the order is not law (and that hospitals should not comply even if it were), many health care providers have preemptively restricted access to care.

The attorneys general’s lawsuit challenging this executive order argues that cutting federal funding for gender-affirming care exceeds Trump’s executive authority and violates constitutional protections, including equal protection and state sovereignty.

“The order is a cruel and baseless broadside against transgender youth, their families, and the doctors and medical institutions that provide them this critical care,” the complaint says. The states are asking the court to block the order and to keep the congressionally-allocated funding in place.

This is one of two current legal challenges to the executive order. Last week, seven families with transgender children, along with two advocacy groups, PFLAG National and GLMA, filed a separate lawsuit arguing that the order is unconstitutional.

“For decades, doctors and other health professionals have followed well-established medical standards to provide care that helps transgender youth thrive,” Alex Sheldon, executive director of GLMA, said in a press release about the lawsuit. “Now, an extreme political agenda is trying to overrule that expertise, putting young people and their providers in danger.”

The impact of the order is already being felt, particularly by families who relocated to states where gender-affirming care was once protected, only to find those safeguards disappearing. One plaintiff in the lawsuit, a mother who moved her family from Tennessee to Virginia after Tennessee banned gender-affirming care, was notified just hours before her daughter’s appointment that treatment would no longer be provided “because of everything going on.”

“[H]er family moved to Virginia to escape the discrimination that they faced in Tennessee and ensure that [her transgender daughter] would have access to necessary medical care.” the complaint states. “Now, [she] feels that the rug has been pulled out from underneath their feet.”

In response to these disruptions, leaders in Democratic-led states are taking action to safeguard access to gender-affirming care. Earlier this month, attorneys general from more than a dozen Democratic-led states — including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Nevada, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin — reaffirmed their commitment to protecting access to gender-affirming care for transgender youth.

“State attorneys general will continue to enforce state laws that provide access to gender-affirming care, in states where such enforcement authority exists, and we will challenge any unlawful effort by the Trump administration to restrict access to it in our jurisdictions,” a collective press release stated.

Some have already cautioned hospitals about the potential legal risks of stopping gender-affirming care for transgender youth. For example, California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) has said that state hospitals and clinics remain legally required to provide this care under California’s anti-discrimination laws. Similarly, New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) recently warned health care providers that shutting down gender-affirming care programs in response to Trump’s executive order would violate state law.

While the exact number of trans youth affected by Trump’s order and the preemptive compliance of health care providers remains unknown, a 2022 report by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law estimates that approximately 300,100 youth between the ages of 13 and 17 identify as transgender in the United States.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.