The State Department is seeing a potentially historic amount of internal defection over the Biden administration’s policies on Gaza, with at least nine dissent memos and two high-profile resignations since October.
According to a report published this week by The Independent, over the course of just two months of Israel’s genocidal assault of Gaza, State Department staff sent at least eight dissent memos, with another confirmed by the publication sent last month.
Dissent memos are a way for State Department staff to express their dissatisfaction with an administration’s policy without fear of retaliation, and are taken seriously within the department, with memos being passed up to senior staff.
It’s rare for such memos to leak and for there to be such a high number of dissent memos over one topic, former staff have said, showing the wide gulf between President Joe Biden’s approach to the genocide and those within his administration. Further, because leaks are rare, it is possible that there have been far more dissent memos over Gaza that have not been uncovered by reporters.
Several sources cited by The Independent say that the nine dissent memos uncovered by the publication represent an unprecedented number in such a short period of time.
“To the best of my knowledge, it is the most on any issue in such a timespan,” said Josh Paul, a former top official overseeing weapons deals in the State Department who resigned in October after 11 years due to the administration’s support of Israel.
Another former top official, Charles Blaha, said that he hadn’t seen that much dissent in his three decades in the department. “I was in the state department for 32 years, including during the Iraq war, and I have never seen this much unhappiness,” Blaha said. “It is even worse than Iraq.”
The former head of the office that oversees the department’s dissent channel, Mitchell Reiss, said that he hadn’t seen a single dissent memo during the first three years of the Iraq War. But Reiss warned that, because the Independent hadn’t seen the content of the memos, they may not all be against Israel’s assault.
Dissent memos whose contents have been leaked, however, have shown that there is strong disagreement with Biden on his support of Israel. A five-page memo sent in November, reported on by Axios, said that Israel is committing “war crimes” and a “genocide” in Gaza and implored Biden to end his complicity and call for a ceasefire. This memo had 100 signatures by employees in the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Another November memo reported by Politico, with an unknown number of signatures, called for a ceasefire and more transparency from the administration around Israel’s brutality toward Palestinians.
Despite the large amount of dissent over Gaza from State Department staff — many of whom are able to access more information about Israel’s genocide than is known to the public — the White House has remained staunch in its support of Israel, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken has fallen in line in public, including with a friendly visit with Israeli officials last month.
Many former State Department officials and those familiar with the department’s structures say that Biden’s strong support for the genocide is, in fact, stifling the department’s ability to properly assess the assault and whether or not it is in line with U.S. and international law to continue sending military aid to Israel. Staff are largely powerless to change policy because of the administration’s stance, experts have said.
“Based on my conversations since October with people at the department, there is a real disconnect between the analysis and policy recommendations of state department personnel relating to Gaza and Israel-Palestine generally and decisions ultimately being made by the White House,” Brian Finucane, another former State Department employee, told The Independent. “The president is the ultimate decider on Gaza and he’s been largely immune to the facts of this disastrous conflict, at least with respect to actual U.S. policy as opposed to rhetoric.”
One official who resigned recently, foreign affairs officer Annelle Sheline, said that she did so because it became “impossible” to do any human rights advocacy due to Biden’s “steady stream of weapons to Israel.” She said she had tried to speak up through dissent memos, but they were ultimately ignored.
“It’s truly unconscionable that this administration portrays itself as so superior to the Trump administration, given his flagrant disregard for U.S. laws, but we have laws that are being broken,” Sheline said in an interview last month. “This administration is not following the law.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.