A new report details how former President Donald Trump’s aides have described to federal investigators his temperament on January 6, 2021, as a mob of his loyalists attacked the U.S. Capitol building to prevent Congress from affirming his 2020 presidential election loss.
The report from ABC News — based on information from sources with direct knowledge of the investigation into Trump being handled by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith — portrays the former president as indifferent to the violence that was being waged in his name. Instead, his former aides have said, Trump was more concerned with how the election was purportedly stolen from him, despite no evidence backing his claims that fraud led to his loss to President Joe Biden two months prior.
According to the report, former Trump deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino pushed Trump to issue a statement on X (then called Twitter) when the violence erupted at the Capitol. At the time, Scavino helped Trump craft his tweets and often authored them himself, only posting after getting approval from Trump to do so.
Scavino described Trump to investigators as being “very angry” on January 6 due to some GOP lawmakers’ refusal to vote against the certification of his election loss. Trump watched the violence unfold on television inside the Oval Office with his arms folded, Scavino recalled.
Trump “was just not interested” in taking action to stop the attack, Scavino told the special counsel’s office, sources indicated to ABC News. Although Scavino described the attack to Trump, alerting him that smoke was coming from the Capitol building and told him that the event would become his “legacy,” Trump refused to issue a public statement urging his loyalists to end the attack.
Later, Scavino told investigators, Trump issued a tweet on his own, stating that then-Vice President Mike Pence “didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done” by refusing to certify votes in the Electoral College, catching aides to the ex-president off-guard. When White House attorneys demanded to know why Scavino would post such a comment on Trump’s behalf, Scavino insisted that he didn’t write it and that Trump had done so without his input.
The report also included comments to Smith’s office from another former White House aide, Nick Luna.
Luna, who was Trump’s personal aide, recalled that, when he alerted the former president that lawmakers, including Pence, had to be evacuated out of the Capitol due to safety concerns, the former president responded by saying “So what?”
Trump’s response indicated that he was “capable of allowing harm to come to one of his closest allies,” Luna told investigators, according to the sources speaking to ABC News.
Republican Adam Kinzinger, a former member of the House of Representatives and one of only two GOP lawmakers to have served on the select committee formed to investigate the January 6 Capitol attack, reacted to the report by stating on CNN that it could create “real trouble” for Trump ahead of his scheduled criminal trial later this year relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“It reaffirms what we’ve already known, but it’s very impactful,” Kinzinger said. “For 187 minutes, for over three hours, Donald Trump sat there watching his insurrection in action and did not act.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.