Skip to content Skip to footer

Slow Progress in Iraq Vote Count Fuels Suspicions

BAGHDAD — Iraq’s embattled election commission announced Tuesday that 79 percent of the votes from parliamentary elections have been counted, a breakthrough for a process so slow that it’s raised suspicions of fraud. The close race got even closer as a secular rival edged nearer to Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s coalition. The longer the process drags on, the more anxious and speculative Iraq’s rival parties become as they await the results of the March 7 vote, the second general election since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

BAGHDAD — Iraq’s embattled election commission announced Tuesday that 79 percent of the votes from parliamentary elections have been counted, a breakthrough for a process so slow that it’s raised suspicions of fraud. The close race got even closer as a secular rival edged nearer to Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s coalition.

The longer the process drags on, the more anxious and speculative Iraq’s rival parties become as they await the results of the March 7 vote, the second general election since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Election Day was hailed as a success as millions of Iraqis defied attacks and intimidation to head to polling stations. The chaotic ballot-counting process, however — coupled with the emergence of challengers to traditional Shiite Muslim and Kurdish parties — has sapped voter confidence amid allegations of ineptitude, fraud and manipulation.

Although nearly every major political bloc has made such claims, the United Nations, Iraqi monitoring groups and Western diplomats have said there’s no evidence of widespread or “systemic” fraud that would discredit the entire vote or any one ticket.

Nevertheless, Maliki’s State of Law coalition made fresh allegations Tuesday, accusing the counting center of doctoring numbers and demanding a recount, according to a letter signed by Maliki and obtained by The Associated Press.

The letter charges that the political allegiance of the counting center’s supervisors undermines “their neutrality in administering such a momentous and crucial process,” according to the AP.

The Independent High Electoral Commission, the body that’s overseeing the election, so far has released only partial results, which point to a narrow lead for Maliki’s coalition — seven out of Iraq’s 18 provinces.

The secular, mixed-sect slate anchored by former premier Ayad Allawi was close behind, leading in five provinces, and it edged past Maliki’s coalition as the top vote getter nationwide, according to incomplete figures from the commission Tuesday.

However, the number of parliamentary seats that each slate wins in each province — not the nationwide popular vote — will determine which coalition has the largest say in forming the next government.

A Western diplomat, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to comment publicly, summed up the complex vote-counting process as “a Florida situation,” an allusion to the confusion that accompanied the recount of the state’s ballots in the 2000 presidential election.

The Shiite, Iranian-backed Iraqi National Alliance and the main Kurdish ticket each lead in three provinces, according to the partial results.

No coalition is expected to win a clear majority, which means that months of intense negotiations are likely before a new government is seated.

McClatchy special correspondent Laith Hammoudi contributed to this article.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.