Washington — The Senate plans crucial votes Saturday on two of the year’s most incendiary political issues: repealing the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays and lesbians and revamping immigration laws to help put children of illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship.
Opponents have blocked both measures for months. The Senate will try to cut off debate on each bill, a maneuver that requires the votes of 60 of the 100 senators.
Should either bill fail to get 60, it’s dead, probably for years to come, since Republicans will control the House of Representatives for two years starting next month. Both measures were campaign promises of President Barack Obama, and neither is expected to get many GOP votes.
Many Republicans were outraged that the votes were even being taken. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., protested that the action is “clearly in keeping with the other side’s political agenda.”
The “don’t ask, don’t tell” bill is the better bet to move ahead. The House of Representatives passed the measure Wednesday by a largely partisan 250-175 vote.
The bill’s Senate co-sponsor, Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said he was confident he had the votes to end debate and move to a final vote, since at least three Republicans are expected to join virtually all the Senate’s 56 Democrats and two independents who support it.
A previous Senate effort to end debate on the question failed, but this is a new version of the legislation and three Republicans say they’re ready to back it now.
The Development Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, aimed at changing immigration law, faces more opposition.
The bill would allow illegal immigrants younger than 30 who entered the U.S. before age 16, lived here for five years without committing serious crimes, graduated from high school and attended college or joined the military to be eligible for legal residency after meeting other criteria.
A study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the act would help 300,000 to 500,000 undocumented immigrants.
Obama and congressional Democratic leaders — who vowed to Hispanic voters during their 2008 campaigns that they’d change immigration laws — say that passing the act is the right thing to do and would help the nation’s economy and military.
Antonia Cortese, the secretary-treasurer of the American Federation of Teachers, said on a conference call with supporters that Saturday’s vote was perhaps the bill’s last best chance.
“If the Senate fails tomorrow it is unclear we’ll have another shot to pass this bill in the next few years,” Cortese said.
DREAM Act opponents consider the bill a backdoor amnesty measure that rewards bad behavior. Roy Beck, the founder and executive director of NumbersUSA, which advocates strict immigration limits and enforcement of immigration laws, called on opponents to contact their senators. He warned that DREAM Act supporters would barrage senators over the next 24 hours.
Repeal of the 17-year-old “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy got a boost late last month when the Defense Department unveiled a study of more than 115,000 military personnel. Seventy percent said that ending the ban on gays serving openly would have a positive or neutral impact. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have urged repeal.
However, opponents noted that the survey found a sizable minority opposed repeal because openly gay service members could affect morale, training and unit cohesion. Opposition was highest among troops in combat.
In addition, heads of individual military services have told Congress they’re against repeal at the moment, while the country is in two wars.
Many Republicans agree.
“I was hoping for the study to be definitive, but it came out ambiguous,” said Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah.
Supporters countered that not only is repeal the right thing to do, but Congress also shouldn’t let courts determine the policy. Military officials worry that court rulings could force change without time for proper preparation.
“We can see the courts moving on this,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “We should … do it legislatively, not leave it to the courts.”
Senators also are debating whether to ratify a new U.S.-Russia Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, an Obama initiative that’s been slowed by Republicans who contend that it would limit the U.S.’s missile defense development. The Pentagon denies that.
Some Republicans were angry that the votes on immigration and gays in the military interrupt the New START debate.
“I think emotions around here are slightly frayed, and I think everybody kind of wants this session to end,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. “It’s my hope it will end with us doing what’s necessary on the START treaty. I think that would be good just to clear that up.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy