Skip to content Skip to footer

Sanders: Supreme Court Is “Out of Control” and Must Be Reformed

The senator criticized the “right-wing, corporate-sponsored Supreme Court” for its clear “extremist agenda.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders participates in a rally in support of Ocasio-Cortez and Bowman's re-election campaigns on June 22, 2024, in Bronx, New York City.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has called for the Supreme Court to be subject to “real” reform after over a decade of right-wing rulings from a bench that has been captured by deep pocketed far right interests has put the U.S at the precipice of a deep plunge into fascism.

Sanders called out the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision for ushering in a “corrupt, billionaire dominated political system” and more recent decisions removing abortion protections; criminalizing homelessness; totally defanging the federal government’s ability to regulate; and, on Monday, granting the president an unprecedented amount of power without consequence.

“These are just some of the dangerous rulings from a right-wing, corporate-sponsored Supreme Court that continues to serve an extremist agenda,” Sanders said.

“If these conservative justices want to make public policy, they should simply quit the Supreme Court and run for political office,” he continued, reiterating observations that the Supreme Court is legislating from the bench as it has concentrated power within the conservative-dominated judiciary branch and trampled over the separation of powers.

Calls for Supreme Court reforms and overhauls have reignited following the Supreme Court’s democracy-shattering presidential immunity ruling as experts warn of the immense and dangerous amount of power now vested in the executive branch, with a nakedly partisan Court poised to support a fascist Donald Trump presidency in whatever horrific actions his administration could dream up.

“At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, billionaire control of our political system, and major threats to the foundations of American democracy, it is clear to me that we need real Supreme Court reform,” Sanders said. “A strong, enforceable code of ethics is a start, but just a start. We’ll need much more than that.”

Sanders has previously supported ideas to rotate Supreme Court justices into federal courts in order to get around lifetime appointments if Congress refuses to implement term limits for justices.

Other Democrats have reupped calls for Supreme Court expansion — adding seats to the Supreme Court to dilute the power of the current right-wing supermajority on the bench.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) gestured to this proposal in a statement about the immunity ruling. In 2023, he and a bicameral group of Democrats reintroduced their bill to add four seats to the Court. The Court has had nine members since 1869, although Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to add four justices in the 1930s.

“This is a rogue, untethered, and damaging Supreme Court,” Markey said. “Today’s ruling is devastating to our democracy. We must reclaim the stolen seats, restore balance and legitimacy to the Court, and begin to undo the damage the MAGA Republican party has wrought.”

Senators Tina Smith (D-Minnesota) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), both sponsors of the bill, outright called for Court expansion.

“Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell stole two seats on the Supreme Court, and we’re living with the consequences,” Warren wrote on social media on Tuesday. “I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: it’s time to expand the Court.”

“This Supreme Court is beholden to right-wing groups and the billionaire mega-donors that fund them,” Smith said. “The Supreme Court is broken. The remedy is clear. Expand the Court.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.