Senate Budget chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) sharply criticized the country’s abnormally large defense budget and the “fraud” and “misconduct” of defense contractors in a hearing on Pentagon spending on Wednesday.
The Pentagon has a budget of a whopping $740 billion this year. That makes up more than half of the discretionary spending authorized by Congress. This figure would be a lot on its own, but, as Sanders pointed out in the hearing, the Department of Defense is often wasteful in its spending and often racks up cost overruns despite a staggeringly large budget.
“The time is long overdue for us to take a hard look at the enormous amount of waste and the cost overruns and fraud, and of the financial mismanagement that has plagued the Department of Defense and the military-industrial complex for decades,” said Sanders. “At a time when we have so many unmet needs in America, we’ve gotta ask ourselves why we are spending more on the military than the next 12 nations combined.”
Sanders points out that the nation’s military budget is larger than it was during the Cold War, and that the Defense Department continually fails to complete an independent audit. Indeed, the Pentagon failed its audit last year, as it has done for the past three years in a row, and many other times in the past.
In 2013, Reuters reported that Defense employees were using fake accounting numbers to balance the department’s budget, and had been for decades. Officials have said that the agency won’t be ready to pass an audit until 2027 at the earliest.
Failing to complete audits, Sanders said, is a large contributor to problems of “waste, fraud and abuse” at the agency.
Much of the nation’s defense budget goes toward defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Boeing. In fact, over half of the Pentagon’s budget goes toward these private contractors, and that spending has grown year by year; in 2020, the Pentagon awarded $445 billion of the $714 billion it spent that year to contractors. And these companies, Sanders points out, are often paying fines for fraud while profiting off of their contracts.
“Since 1995, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have paid over $5.4 billion in fines or related settlements for fraud or misconduct,” said Sanders. “Further, I find it interesting that despite the fact that the lion’s share of revenue for some of the defense contractors comes from the taxpayers of the United States, these same companies provide their CEOs and executives excessive and extremely large compensation packages.”
In 2020, Lockheed Martin paid its CEO $23 million, Sanders points out, while 95 percent of the company’s revenue was from government contracts; Raytheon’s CEO received $19.4 million, while 94 percent of the company’s revenue came from government contracts.
“These companies, for all intents and purposes, almost function as government agencies — vast majority of their revenue coming from the public — and yet their CEOs make almost 100 times more than the Secretary of State,” Sanders continued.
Many people, including Sanders, have criticized the department’s enormous budget over the years and have called for a drastic reduction in that spending. Progressives argue that more defense spending does not make us safer — rather, it is wasteful and at best, only fuels further violence.
“It is time to hold the DOD to the same level of accountability as the rest of the government,” said Sanders. “We do not need a defense budget that is bloated, that is wasteful, and that has, in too many cases, massive fraud.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.