Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and two other senators have introduced resolutions that will force the Senate to undertake the first-ever vote in Congress on blocking weapons to Israel.
On Wednesday, Sanders introduced six resolutions blocking six sales of different weapons contained within the $20 billion weapons deal announced by the Biden administration in August. The sales include many of the types of weapons that Israel has used in its relentless campaign of extermination in Gaza over the past year.
The senator said it is clear that the sales must be blocked as Israel openly violates humanitarian guidelines — making it a violation of multiple U.S. laws to continue funding its military, Sanders said.
“Sending more weapons is not only immoral, it is also illegal. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act lay out clear requirements for the use of American weaponry – Israel has egregiously violated those rules,” said Sanders. “There is a mountain of documentary evidence demonstrating that these weapons are being used in violation of U.S. and international law.”
According to Sanders’s office, the Senate will vote on the resolutions in November, when the Senate reconvenes. The resolutions, known as Joint Resolutions of Disapproval, are privileged, meaning that Sanders can essentially bypass Senate leadership to force a vote on the legislation.
This will be the first time in history that Congress has ever voted on legislation to block a weapons sale to Israel, as the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project pointed out. This is despite the U.S. having sent Israel over $250 billion in military assistance in recent decades, according to analyst Stephen Semler, as Israel has carried out ethnic cleansings and massacres across Palestine and in Lebanon.
Two senators, Peter Welch (Vermont) and Jeff Merkley (Oregon) joined Sanders in introducing four of the sales — the sales of JDAMs and JDAM receivers, tank cartridges and mortar cartridges. Welch joined Sanders in blocking the sale of tactical vehicles, while Sanders was alone in introducing the resolution to block the largest portion of the sale — $18.8 billion worth of fighter aircrafts and F-15 upgrades.
The JDAMs, or kits that turn unguided bombs into “smart,” precision weapons that Israel has used extensively to kill Palestinian civilians in Gaza, are slated for “imminent delivery,” according to Sanders’s office. The other equipment is slated to be delivered over the next few years.
Sanders spoke about the need for the sales to be blocked in a speech on the Senate floor last week.
“The whole world has witnessed Israel’s restriction of humanitarian aid. The UN and virtually every humanitarian group says that Israel’s restrictive policies are the primary cause of the humanitarian catastrophe now taking place in Gaza. The [Biden] administration says as much,” said Sanders. “No matter how people here in Washington may try to spin it, the simple fact is that we must end our complicity in Israel’s illegal and indiscriminate military campaign.”
The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.
However, Sanders’s move is in line with public opinion. Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.