And what if the mother of political communication were the Princess Scheherazade, who understood that telling make-believe stories and making people dream allows one to influence them profoundly?
Karl Rove, George W. Bush’s spin doctor, once defined a great principle of political communication, one of its key tenets – even its very basis – as storytelling, which he himself called Scheherazade’s strategy: “When policy dooms you, start telling stories – stories so fabulous, so gripping, so spellbinding that the king (or, in this case, the American citizen who theoretically rules our country) forgets all about a lethal policy.”
Also See: Responding to the Crisis With Communication
This Scheherazade strategy contains all the art of telling the stories people will want to hear, when they want to hear them, and which they want to believe.
Why Scheherazade? One finds the explanation on the “Culture de l’image” blog: “one must transpose oneself to the Eighth Century, to the kingdom of Persian Sultan Shâriar, who, to take revenge for the wife who left him, adopted the bad habit of killing each morning the virgin he had married the previous evening. To bring this massacre to an end, Scheherazade, the Vizier’s daughter, married the sultan and, when evening came, told him a story without completing it. Her husband, who wanted to know what happened next, kept her alive another day. The stratagem lasted a thousand and one nights, at the end of which, an appeased Shâriar definitively renounced killing his wife.”
From Shâriar to George Bush, in the end, the world has changed but little and princes follow one another, whether the stories are told by a Scheherazade or a Karl Rove.
To read or reread: the [French] interview of Tony Blair’s spin doctor, Alastair Campbell: part one and part two.
Translation: Truthout French Language Editor Leslie Thatcher
Responding to the Crisis With Communication
Pierre Labasse and Jean-Marie Charpentier, Les Echos
Wednesday 30 December 2009
Tensions within society and within companies are rising as the crisis continues. That which one sees expressed on internet social network sites, the radicalization of conflicts and suicides at work herald cracks and ruptures. While world political leaders must urgently find new financial regulations, company management must urgently find new social regulations, even as exclusively financial rationales lead to forms of management without people.
It’s time once again to highlight a practice that is no longer even discussed, so tarnished has it become: communication. Never have we needed comprehension and explanation more, but also, and perhaps above all, we need connection, exchange, dialogue. Instead of that, “spin” in the company and elsewhere too often confines itself to pursuit of image, with concern for reputation and for how word choice will be interpreted. Social issues are the great missing element. There is communication of changes; but no communication in order to change. Many big companies, by favoring the “governance of things,” run into a dead end in “governance of people” and “de-socialize” at high speed. Several years ago, some were forecasting companies without factories. What are appearing today are companies without men and women! Apart from the question of employment – which is contracting under the impact of the crisis – there is also that of organization which distances employees from one another and provokes isolation. The very notion of the team is frequently repudiated, or in any case, badly managed.
The problem is profound. Dramatic situations call for immediate action, but it is also necessary to think through the future of relations within the enterprise. Twenty or thirty years after the creation of communications management, the time has come to refocus communication, to give communicators a social role of intermediation, of facilitation of the connections and exchanges with employees – a role alongside line managers in collaboration with human resources. If we agree not to limit ourselves to “spin,” communication becomes a more critical issue than ever, one that affects the heart of the matter, the place of the other, and social connection.
Pierre Labasse is honorary president of the Association Française de Communication Interne [French Association for Internal Communication] (AFCI) and Jean-Marie Charpentier is AFCI’s director.
Translation: Truthout French Language Editor Leslie Thatcher
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.