Skip to content Skip to footer

Ron Wyden Submits Bill to Drastically Reform Supreme Court

“I think we can all agree it’s time to reform the Supreme Court,” said Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden.

Visitors walk near the U.S. Supreme Court on September 10, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

A Democratic U.S. senator has introduced legislation that would drastically reform the Supreme Court, proposing, among other items, expanding the number of justices to 15 members.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) introduced the bill on Wednesday. With the Senate narrowly divided with a slight Democratic majority, and the House of Representatives currently controlled by a similarly narrow Republican majority, passage or even consideration of the bill is highly unlikely during this congressional term. Still, Wyden is hopeful that aspects of the bill could be passed in the future, with the goal of reestablishing public confidence in the Court amid a series of ethics scandals.

“I think we can all agree it’s time to reform the Supreme Court. As of today, I have the bill to do it,” Wyden said on X.

The bill proposes increasing the number of justices on the Court from nine to 15 over the next dozen years. During this time, presidents would nominate justices on a regular basis, every first and third year of a term. The bill would also forbid the Senate from stonewalling nominees from a president — once a nominee is selected by the Judiciary Committee, the Senate would be required to conduct a full vote on the nomination within 180 days.

Advocates for court expansion note that it would be beneficial for many reasons — for example, it could reduce the politicization of the nomination process, as a single nominee on a 15-member court would have less sway on final decision-making than a nominee on a nine-member court would.

The bill would also place new restrictions on the Supreme Court, including limits on how justices can issue rulings on laws that have been passed to ensure a greater respect for judicial precedent. Justices would still be able to rule on the constitutionality of federal actions and state matters with a simple majority decision. But on legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by a president, a new “check” would be established, requiring two-thirds of the Supreme Court to find the law unconstitutional in order for their verdict to hold weight.

Justices would also be subjected to yearly IRS audits that would be released to the public, with nominees to the Supreme Court required to release at least three years of their most recent filings before being considered by the Senate for approval. Under Wyden’s plan, justices could also be recused more easily — the bill would eliminate the current standard where justices decide, individually, whether they should recuse themselves, and instead allow two-thirds of the Court to decide whether a justice should sit out a case.

Discussing his plan with The Washington Post, Wyden explained that his proposals were needed to increase confidence in — and lessen the politicization of— the Supreme Court. Said Wyden:

It’s not an atomic secret that the process for selecting justices is politicized. You’ve got this thoroughly politicized process resulting in a Supreme Court that now frequently issues sweeping rulings to overturn laws and upend precedents. We are proposing a way to restore some balance between the three branches of government.

Polling does indeed show that most Americans have a low opinion of the Supreme Court. In a Marquette University Law School poll that was published last month, just 43 percent of respondents said they approved of the Court’s actions in recent years. Meanwhile, nearly 6 in 10 respondents (57 percent) said they disapproved of the Supreme Court.

Much of the disdain for the current incarnation of the Court is likely due to the lack of an enforceable ethics code. When asked their opinions on the justices’ ethical standards, a plurality of respondents, 36 percent, gave them a “low” or “very low” rating. Another 34 percent described the justices’ ethical standards as “average,” with only 27 percent calling their standards “high” or “very high.”

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $145,000 in one-time donations and to add 1489 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy