Skip to content Skip to footer

Ron Wyden Submits Bill to Drastically Reform Supreme Court

“I think we can all agree it’s time to reform the Supreme Court,” said Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden.

Visitors walk near the U.S. Supreme Court on September 10, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

A Democratic U.S. senator has introduced legislation that would drastically reform the Supreme Court, proposing, among other items, expanding the number of justices to 15 members.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) introduced the bill on Wednesday. With the Senate narrowly divided with a slight Democratic majority, and the House of Representatives currently controlled by a similarly narrow Republican majority, passage or even consideration of the bill is highly unlikely during this congressional term. Still, Wyden is hopeful that aspects of the bill could be passed in the future, with the goal of reestablishing public confidence in the Court amid a series of ethics scandals.

“I think we can all agree it’s time to reform the Supreme Court. As of today, I have the bill to do it,” Wyden said on X.

The bill proposes increasing the number of justices on the Court from nine to 15 over the next dozen years. During this time, presidents would nominate justices on a regular basis, every first and third year of a term. The bill would also forbid the Senate from stonewalling nominees from a president — once a nominee is selected by the Judiciary Committee, the Senate would be required to conduct a full vote on the nomination within 180 days.

Advocates for court expansion note that it would be beneficial for many reasons — for example, it could reduce the politicization of the nomination process, as a single nominee on a 15-member court would have less sway on final decision-making than a nominee on a nine-member court would.

The bill would also place new restrictions on the Supreme Court, including limits on how justices can issue rulings on laws that have been passed to ensure a greater respect for judicial precedent. Justices would still be able to rule on the constitutionality of federal actions and state matters with a simple majority decision. But on legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by a president, a new “check” would be established, requiring two-thirds of the Supreme Court to find the law unconstitutional in order for their verdict to hold weight.

Justices would also be subjected to yearly IRS audits that would be released to the public, with nominees to the Supreme Court required to release at least three years of their most recent filings before being considered by the Senate for approval. Under Wyden’s plan, justices could also be recused more easily — the bill would eliminate the current standard where justices decide, individually, whether they should recuse themselves, and instead allow two-thirds of the Court to decide whether a justice should sit out a case.

Discussing his plan with The Washington Post, Wyden explained that his proposals were needed to increase confidence in — and lessen the politicization of— the Supreme Court. Said Wyden:

It’s not an atomic secret that the process for selecting justices is politicized. You’ve got this thoroughly politicized process resulting in a Supreme Court that now frequently issues sweeping rulings to overturn laws and upend precedents. We are proposing a way to restore some balance between the three branches of government.

Polling does indeed show that most Americans have a low opinion of the Supreme Court. In a Marquette University Law School poll that was published last month, just 43 percent of respondents said they approved of the Court’s actions in recent years. Meanwhile, nearly 6 in 10 respondents (57 percent) said they disapproved of the Supreme Court.

Much of the disdain for the current incarnation of the Court is likely due to the lack of an enforceable ethics code. When asked their opinions on the justices’ ethical standards, a plurality of respondents, 36 percent, gave them a “low” or “very low” rating. Another 34 percent described the justices’ ethical standards as “average,” with only 27 percent calling their standards “high” or “very high.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 8 days to add 460 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.