President Donald Trump is trying to bury the findings of a new climate change report commissioned by his own administration.
The National Climate Assessment, which is required to publish its findings every four years, released its latest 1,656-page report during the holiday doldrums on Black Friday. In the process, the administration effectively buried the scientists’ conclusions on how man-made climate change will devastate America’s public health, economy, infrastructure and coastlines, as well as cause hundreds of billions of dollars of damage to the planet over the next few decades.
“This report will be used in court in significant ways. I can imagine a lawyer for the Trump administration being asked by a federal judge, ‘How can the federal government acknowledge the seriousness of the problem, and then set aside the rules that protect the American people from the problem?’ And they might squirm around coming up with an answer,” Richard L. Revesz, an expert in environmental law at New York University, told the Times.
But conservative media have not only done Trump’s bidding by burying coverage of the climate change report, but they’ve also applauded the Trump administration’s approach.
Former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012 and 2016, appeared on CNN on Sunday to baselessly claim “This is a report generated by people who are in the bureaucracy. These are not Trump appointees.”
“You mean they’re non-political?” the CNN host cut him off.
“Well, no,” Santorum replied. “I think the point that Donald Trump make is true which is, look, if there was no climate change we’d have a lot of scientists looking for work. The reality is that a lot of these scientists are driven by the money that they receive. And of course they don’t receive money from corporations and Exxon and the like. Why? Because they’re not allowed to, because it’s tainted. But they can receive it who support their agenda, and that I believe is what’s really going on here. No one doubts that the climate is changing. No one doubts that. The question is, how much does man contribute, number one? And number two, what can man do to actually change it? And those are the two big issues that we really don’t talk about.”
Danielle Pletka of the conservative American Enterprise Institute appeared on “Meet the Press” to further denounce concerns about global warming. “I’m not a scientist,” Pletka began, before adding that “we need to also recognize we had two of the coldest years, biggest drop in global temperatures that we have had since the 1980s, the biggest in the last 100 years. We don’t talk about that.” In its analysis of the report, The New York Times wrote that it described how many earlier predictions about global warming had come to pass, how ecological problems caused by climate change are all interconnected and how everything from coastal sea levels and air quality to agriculture and political stability in other countries will be impacted by this issue.
WTH? This is completely untrue. What is the matter with these shows? https://t.co/zxb4lTgjm1
— Howard Dean (@GovHowardDean) November 25, 2018
Maybe if we are going to ask people about climate change on a show they should either be an expert or know how to read something written by one?
— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) November 25, 2018
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.