One of Donald Trump’s picks to serve on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could be disqualified from ruling on disputes arising from one the most high profile ongoing organizing efforts.
William Emanuel said this week, in ethics filings, that he will recuse himself for two years in matters involving Nissan, among other clients. He reiterated the position, when prompted, at a hearing held Thursday before the Senate Heath, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee.
United Auto Workers filed a petition with the NLRB earlier this week, on behalf of Nissan workers at a plant in Canton, Miss.–to proceed to an election to certify that the workers want to be represented by the union.
If workers vote to be represented by the UAW, it will create a bargaining unit of more than 4,000 employees at a plant where more than 6,000 people are on the payroll.
The UAW has tried, in recent years, without much success, to organize automotive plants located in the south. The organizing drive at the Canton factory garnered national attention earlier this year, when it involved a march and a rally featuring civil rights activists, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and actor Danny Glover.
In a press released issued Tuesday, UAW officials said that workers in Canton moved to hold an election “citing a pattern of labor abuses by Nissan against its predominantly African-American workforce.”
If confirmed by the Senate, Emanuel will have to sit out disputes involving Nissan because he represented the company while working for Littler Mendelson — a law-firm known for its union-busting expertise.
The UAW has already filed a number of unfair labor practice complaints against Nissan — filings that could themselves delay the union election, according to the AP.
Unfair labor practices are first brought before an administrative law judge. They move to the NLRB, if one party appeals the decision.
The board — an independent agency with five members — is currently staffed by two Democrats and one Republican. Emanuel and another Republican nominee, Mavin Kaplan, will tip the balance in favor of the GOP, if confirmed.
Both Kaplan and Emanuel appeared before the Senate HELP Committee on Thursday, for a joint confirmation hearing. Emanuel was also pressed to recuse himself in cases involving certain issues, when Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned the nominee about past musings.
Warren noted that Emanuel has written, as a scholar, about: “whether employers can require workers to waive their rights to class actions, whether employers can prevent union workers from protesting on their property, and what the boundaries of a bargaining unit should be.”
“Some of your views are pretty extreme, and go to the heart of cases that the NLRB might decide,” she said.
Emanuel replied, stating that recusal is only required if he is asked to rule on “cases involving my law firm.”
“I do not believe, however, that recusal would apply to issues. The fact that I may have advised or written a brief on an issue in the past doesn’t mean I would have to recuse myself on that issue,” he said.
Warren responded, claiming that it wasn’t any legal work or advice that would prompt recusal, but scholarly opinions indicating a bias.
“I’m just saying you have made it clear that you have prejudged in three areas where you put your name on it,” she said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.