Skip to content Skip to footer

Republicans Consider Making Elon Musk Speaker of the House

The US Constitution does not stipulate that the speaker has to be a current member of the House.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Co-Chair of the newly announced Department of Government Efficiency, arrives on Capitol Hill on December 5, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

Several Republican lawmakers in Congress are calling on billionaire Elon Musk, president-elect Donald Trump’s pick to co-lead a purported commission on government efficiency, to replace current Speaker of the House Mike Johnson.

Support for Johnson has shifted considerably this week as he tried to pass a continuing resolution bill to fund the government into spring. That measure failed when Musk, and eventually Trump, called on Republicans in the House to vote against it, resulting in Johnson scrapping the bill.

Without a new measure to replace it, the federal government is set to shut down this weekend. Many Republicans blame Johnson for the mess, claiming that his negotiating with Democrats — whose votes he needs to pass any spending measure, as some Republicans in the narrowly divided House will vote against any continuing resolution bill — was unacceptable.

Lauding Musk’s actions against the bill, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) suggested on the social media site X (which Musk owns) that the billionaire should take over the speakership from Johnson.

The U.S. Constitution stipulates that the House of Representatives “shall choose their speaker and other officers.” But it doesn’t require a person to be a duly-elected member of the House before becoming speaker.

If Republicans move forward with this plan, it will be the first time ever that a speaker of the House was not also a representative within the House.

“The Speaker of the House need not be a member of Congress,” Paul said, adding that he believes Musk would be a good choice to “disrupt the swamp.”

Far right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) agreed with Paul’s assessment, saying she could “be open to supporting @elonmusk for Speaker of the House.”

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said that one of the two heads of the soon-to-be-formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — Musk or Vivek Ramaswamy — should become speaker of the House.

“I think we need to go outside the box. I think we need to look to a different place,” Lee stated in an interview, adding that GOP lawmakers should “choose one of them — I don’t care which one — to be our speaker.”

Some Democratic lawmakers also joked that Musk should run the House, issuing tongue-in-cheek commentaries on how he seemingly already runs it, as the billionaire recently managed to kill spending bills through dozens of posts on X.

“If Elon Musk is kind of cosplaying co-president here, I don’t know why Trump doesn’t just hand him the Oval Office, or Speaker Johnson should maybe just hand Elon Musk the gavel if they just want that billionaire to run the country,” Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) told reporters.

There would be a slew of concerns if Musk becomes speaker of the House, including over whether he would divest from his business interests. As an acolyte of Trump’s, Musk likely wouldn’t do so, creating considerable conflicts of interest, as he would be tasked with overseeing the passage of legislation that would affect his businesses.

Musk and Ramaswamy have made it clear that, as heads of DOGE, they intend to consider making cuts to safety net programs, including Social Security. As speaker of the House, Musk could fast-track legislation that would make those cuts.

On social media, Musk frequently peddles conspiracy theories and amplifies antisemitic and transphobic talking points. There’s no question that a Speaker Musk would push anti-trans legislation, as many Republicans relied heavily on fearmongering about trans children to bolster their 2024 campaigns.

Musk would likely make an unpopular choice for speaker of the House. According to a Quinnipiac University poll that was published this week, only 39 percent of voters have a favorable view of Musk, while 44 percent say they have an unfavorable view of the billionaire.

If Musk were appointed to a role like the speakership, his approval ratings would likely plummet even more. Asked in the same poll whether they liked the idea of Musk playing a prominent role in the Trump administration, only 41 percent of voters said they approved of the idea, while 53 percent said they disapproved.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $120,000 in one-time donations and to add 1383 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy