As most federal and state races for political office enter the general election phase, a number of anti-abortion Republicans are scrambling to appeal to voters who don’t share their extremist ideals.
Sixty percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal in most or all circumstances, according to a recent USA Today/Ipsos poll. Republicans who won their primaries by flaunting their anti-abortion views are likely aware of these numbers — and they are now sanitizing their ideology in order to appeal to a wider slate of voters in the upcoming general elections.
Many GOP candidates have been quietly removing their anti-abortion stances from their campaign websites. Arizona Republican Blake Masters, who is running against Sen. Mark Kelly (D), is attempting to soften his image by highlighting his support for bans on so-called “late- and partial-birth abortions” in campaign videos. But Masters’s website previously said that he backs a federal “personhood” law that would ban almost all abortion across the country. Masters also bragged on his website that he was “100 percent” anti-abortion.
Those statements are now nowhere to be found on his site.
GOP challenger Tom Barrett, who is facing off against Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin in a hotly contested Michigan congressional race, has deleted the entire section on abortion from his website. That section included his belief that abortion should be banned at all stages of pregnancy.
New Mexico Republican Mark Ronchetti, who is running against Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, is also softening his anti-abortion rhetoric. Ronchetti has strong ties to extremist groups like Right to Life and has previously expressed support for banning abortion at all stages of pregnancy. But his tone in recent ads is markedly different.
“I’m personally pro-life, but I believe we can all come together on a policy that reflects our shared values,” he said in a recent campaign video.
The shift in tone comes as other polling indicates that abortion will play a big role in this year’s midterms, which are set to take place just months after the Supreme Court’s decision in June to overturn Roe v. Wade and upend abortion protections across the country. According to Pew Research Center, 56 percent of registered voters consider abortion a “top issue” — a 13-point jump from March of this year.
“Now that [rights to accessing abortion] are being dismantled, [Republicans] have to confront the fact that most voters never wanted abortion to disappear,” Washington Post columnist Paul Waldman wrote this week. “They’ve chosen to do so by evading, distracting and misleading.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 231 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy