The U.S. has fallen tens of billions of dollars short of paying its agreed-upon “fair share” of climate funding targets, a new report finds as world leaders undergo climate talks at the COP27 conference in Egypt this month.
According to a new analysis by Carbon Brief, the U.S. was supposed to be paying about $40 billion of the U.S.$100 billion that wealthy countries have pledged to pay each year for climate financing in developing countries by 2020. This figure is proportional to the amount of historical emissions emitted by each country; the U.S. is a top emitter of greenhouse gasses and is responsible for about 52 percent of historical emissions by wealthy countries.
However, the analysis of 2020 data, the closest year for which data is available, found that the U.S. paid only $7.6 billion that year into that goal. This represents only about 19 percent of its fair share.
Other wealthy countries are also falling behind, though the U.S. is proportionately the worst offender. Canada only gave 37 percent of its fair share, the report found, while Australia gave 38 percent and the U.K. gave 76 percent. Germany, France and Japan provided more than their fair share, but their funding is in the form of loans and not grants, which are only further marginalizing recipients by making them indebted to these countries.
Overall, only $83 billion of climate financing was given in 2020, with $60 billion coming from countries and $23 billion coming from climate funding organizations and private sources.
Wealthy countries had agreed to the $100 billion target in 2009 in order to help poorer countries adapt climate-friendly energy sources and fund resiliency measures like infrastructure and farming.
Wealthy countries released a roadmap in 2021 to reach the $100 billion goal by 2023, which would miss the original goal by two years. Further, research shows that $100 billion is a miniscule amount of funding compared to what is actually needed to build resiliency and keep the climate crisis in check in poorer countries.
Analysts and advocates say that the money is crucial not just to maintain a liveable planet but also to advance climate justice.
The failure to fund the target will be crucial to talks at COP27, which began on Sunday. Though countries in the Global South have not contributed significantly to the climate crisis, they are and will continue to be the hardest hit by the climate crisis, as they have fewer resources to respond to climate disasters like heat waves and floods.
Countries like the U.S., meanwhile, have contributed greatly to the crisis, but continually fail to commit to action that is strong enough to meet the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius or lower; the United Nations has found that there is “no credible pathway to 1.5C in place” for the world to reach.
The report is a show of how the U.S. is shirking its international responsibility to mitigate the climate crisis even though $40 billion is an almost negligible amount of money to spend on climate goals when compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars the U.S. spends on defense each year — much of which goes toward private defense contractors — or the trillions of dollars that the government allows the wealthy to hoard with sweeping tax cuts.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.