After their attempt to privatize Social Security in 2005 was met with widespread public outcry, the GOP’s strategy on Social Security has been two-fold. First, Republicans deny they are interested in privatization. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently told the Wall Street Journal that “no one has a proposal up to cut Social Security,” (his own book proposes doing so), while conservatives in the media have tried to argue that Republicans don’t actually want to privatize Social Security.
The second tactic has been to obfuscate their privatization plans by sugarcoating them in flowery, palatable language. President Bush’s privatization plan is a prime example. In his 2005 State of the Union, President Bush said we needed to “save” Social Security and give younger workers a “better deal” by having “voluntary personal retirement accounts,” the poll-tested language for privatization. Bush now says his greatest failure was not privatizing Social Security.
However, such rhetoric belies their record. A thorough review of the voting records and statements of Republicans in Congress reveals a critical mass of GOPers who have supported privatizing Social Security. In total, 47 percent of House Republicans and 49 percent of Senate Republicans are on record supporting the privatization of Social Security. Some, including Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), want to go even further and “wean everybody” off of Social Security altogether.
As ThinkProgress noted yesterday, Republicans in Congress have long operated by the “majority of the majority” principle, whereby legislation is only advanced by a GOP Speaker if it is supported by a majority of Republicans. With many prominent GOP candidates in favor of privatizing or eliminating Social Security, including Rand Paul, Ken Buck, Dan Coats, Sharron Angle, Dan Benishek, Ben Quayle, Star Parker, and Jesse Kelly, it’s likely that a GOP-controlled Congress would have the necessary votes to revisit the issue.
Here are the 104 Republicans in Congress who support privatizing Social Security (leadership in bold):
Senate (20)
Jeff Sessions (AL)
Richard Shelby (AL)
Jon Kyl (AZ)
John McCain (AZ)
Saxby Chambliss (GA)
Chuck Grassley (IA)
Richard Lugar (IN)
Pat Roberts (KS)
Sam Brownback (KS)
Mitch McConnell (KY)
Roger Wicker (MS)
Thad Cochran (MS)
Judd Gregg (NH)
James Inhofe (OK)
Tom Coburn (OK)
Jim DeMint (SC)
Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX)
Bob Bennett (UT)
Orrin Hatch (UT)
Mike Enzi (WY)
House of Representatives (84)
Jo Bonner (AL-01)
Spencer Bachus (AL-06)
Trent Franks (AZ-02)
Wally Herger (CA-02)
Dan Lungren (CA-03)
Devin Nunes (CA-21)
David Dreier (CA-26)
Jerry Lewis (CA-41)
Ken Calvert (CA-44)
Dana Rohrabacher (CA-46)
John Campbell (CA-48)
Darrell Issa (CA-49)
Duncan Hunter (CA-52)
Doug Lamborn (CO-05)
Jeff Miller (FL-01)
Ander Crenshaw (FL-04)
Ginny Brown-Waite (FL-05)
Cliff Stearns (FL-06)
Adam Putnam (FL-12)
Connie Mack (FL-14)
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL-18)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-25)
Jack Kingston (GA-01)
Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03)
Tom Price (GA-06)
John Linder (GA-07)
Phil Gingrey (GA-11)
Tom Latham (IA-04)
Steve King (IA-05)
Judy Biggert (IL-13)
John Shimkus (IL-19)
Dan Burton (IN-05)
Mike Pence (IN-06)
Rodney Alexander (LA-05)
Roscoe Bartlett (MD-06)
Pete Hoekstra (MI-02)
Vern Ehlers (MI-03)
David Lee Camp (MI-04)
John Kline (MN-02)
Erik Paulsen* (MN-03)
Todd Akin (MO-02)
Roy Blunt (MO-07)
Virginia Foxx (NC-05)
Howard Coble (NC-06)
Sue Myrick (NC-09)
Patrick McHenry (NC-10)
Jeff Fortenberry (NE-01)
Lee Terry (NE-02)
Scott Garrett (NJ-05)
Peter King (NY-03)
John Boehner (OH-08)
John Sullivan (OK-01)
Tom Cole (OK-04)
Jim Gerlach* (PA-06)
Bill Shuster (PA-09)
Joseph Pitts (PA-16)
Joe Wilson (SC-02)
Gresham Barrett (SC-03)
Bob Inglis (SC-04)
Zach Wamp (TN-03)
Marsha Blackburn (TN-07)
Louie Gohmert (TX-01)
Sam Johnson (TX-03)
Jeb Hensarling (TX-05)
Joe Barton (TX-06)
Kevin Brady (TX-08)
Michael McCaul (TX-10)
Mike Conaway (TX-11)
Mac Thornberry (TX-13)
Ron Paul (TX-14)
Randy Neugebauer (TX-19)
Kenny Marchant (TX-24)
Michael Burgess (TX-26)
John Carter (TX-31)
Pete Sessions (TX-32)
Rob Bishop (UT-01)
Jason Chaffetz (UT-03)
Eric Cantor (VA-07)
Doc Hastings (WA-04)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)
Paul Ryan (WI-01)
Tom Petri (WI-06)
Shelley Moore Capito (WV-02)
Cynthia Lummis (WY-AL)
*Reps. Gerlach and Paulsen initially co-sponsored bills that would privatize Social Security before withdrawing their co-sponsorships.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy