If you’ve been to high school in the US in the past 50 years, then you know his book. J.D. Salinger was not as prolific as many authors, but few could even dream of being as influential. Today, Salinger’s son announced that, after years of life in seclusion, his father, author of the 1951 classic “The Catcher in the Rye,” died yesterday at his home in Cornish, N.H. Salinger was 91.
After “Catcher in the Rye,” Salinger went on to publish a handful of additional works, acclaimed by critics and fans alike – “Nine Stories” (1953), “Franny and Zooey” (1961) and “Raise High the Roof Beams, Carpenters” (1963). But nothing else would capture the world’s attention to quite the extent of “The Catcher in the Rye,” with its alienated, disillusioned, prep school dropout narrator, Holden Caulfield.
An early obituary of Salinger credits “The Catcher in the Rye” with long- and wide-ranging impact. “Novels from Evan Hunter’s ‘The Blackboard Jungle’ to Curtis Sittenfeld’s ‘Prep,’ movies from ‘Rebel Without a Cause’ to ‘The Breakfast Club,’ and countless rock ‘n’ roll songs echoed Salinger’s message of kids under siege,” writes Hillel Italie. “One of the great anti-heroes of the 1960s, Benjamin Braddock of ‘The Graduate,’ was but a blander version of Salinger’s narrator.”
For some decades now, “Catcher” has become standard fare in most US high schools. For at least two generations of us, reading the book is one of the indelible memories of 10th-grade English.
But in recent years, there have been debates over the book’s continuing merit. While some young readers find Holden’s struggles with the “phonies” of the adult world as fresh as ever, others say they cannot relate, and some teachers have questioned the value of insisting that today’s kids need to interact with a fictive character rooted in the Manhattan of the 1950s.
At only six years younger than Holden, I am perhaps the wrong age to enter into such a debate. But I will share one memory.
About a decade ago, I was tutoring a New York City school kid who was failing English. Gary was certainly bright enough, but he hated to read. He despised fiction in particular, he told me, and could not bring himself to finish a single book assigned in English class. I met him just as he was encountering “The Catcher in the Rye.”
To encourage Gary and keep him company, I bought a copy of my own and re-read the book for the first time in about 30 years. I wondered how it would read as an adult. To my surprise, I felt its poignant bite all over again. I wondered, however, what Gary would think.
At our next tutoring session, for the first time, he was sitting straight up at his desk. “I didn’t know people wrote books like this,” he said. In part, he meant the language – still surprising in a school book after 50 years. But on another level, he meant something more. “It talks about things that people really think about,” he said.
By the time we met again, Gary had read more than the required number of pages and “Catcher” went on to become the first novel he ever finished. Later, his in-class essay on Holden’s sense of alienation won him an A. By the time we hit the next novel – Stephen Crane’s “Maggie: Girl of the Streets” – Gary had a brand-new confidence. He didn’t like “Maggie” nearly as well, but he’d gotten the idea of reading.
He finished English that year with a B.
Gary’s experience, of course, is just one story. But I can’t help wondering how many times it was repeated over the course of half a century.
Marjorie Kehe is the Monitor’s book editor.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.