Manchester, New Hampshire – Tensions between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney finally spilled onto the debate stage Sunday morning when moderator David Gregory gave Gingrich the opportunity to call Romney a liar. Perhaps without meaning to, Gingrich ended up catching Romney in a lie moments later.
In campaigning for the Iowa caucuses, Gingrich complained that Romney should have interceded with a super PAC run by former Romney staffers and urged it to stop running vicious ads against the former House speaker. Romney often replied that he had no control over the super PAC, and that, in fact, it was illegal for him to coordinate with the group. To which Gingrich often said there is nothing to prevent Romney from publicly disavowing the group, Restore Our Future. To which Romney often replied: This is the big leagues. If you can't stand the heat, etc.
Sunday morning in Concord, N.H., Gregory focused on the disagreement. He noted that a former Gingrich campaign spokesman had launched a pro-Gingrich super PAC and was preparing to launch an attack against Romney, calling him a “predator” for killing jobs when he led Bain Capital, the private equity firm that enriched him before he entered politics.
“You would have to say that Bain at times engaged in behavior where they looted a company leaving behind 1,700 people,” said Gingrich.
“You have agreed with the characterization that Governor Romney is a liar,” said Gregory. “Look at him now; do you stand by that claim?”
“Sure,” replied Gingrich, not missing a beat.
In previous debates, the “Not Romney” candidates, when offered a chance to slam the front-runner, have often backpedaled. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty provided perhaps the best example of that kind of wimping out last summer. Pawlenty, who is now supporting Romney, had attacked him for instituting universal health care in Massachusetts, calling it “Obamneycare.” But when asked to say it to Romney's face on the debate stage, Pawlenty refused.
Here, two days before the New Hampshire primary, no one was pulling a Pawlenty.
However, Gingrich handed Romney an opening to repeat charges against him that were hammered home in the negative ads.
“Governor,” Gingrich told Romney, “I wish you would calmly and clearly state that it is your former staff running the PAC, it is your millionaire friends giving to the PAC, and you know some of the ads are untrue. Just say that straightforward.”
Romney, unfazed: “Of course it's former people of mine. Of course it's people who support me. They wouldn't be putting money into a PAC that supports me if they weren't people who support me,” he said.
Then, Romney told what can only be described as an untruth.
“And as regards to their ads,” he said, “I haven't seen them.”
Yet, seconds later, he added, “But let me tell you this, the ad I saw said you were forced out of the speakership. That was correct. It said that you sat down with Nancy Pelosi and argued for a climate change bill. That was correct. It said that you called Paul Ryan's plan to provide Medicare reform a right wing social engineering plan. It said that as part of an ethics investigation, that you had to reimburse some $300,000.”
Gingrich did not appear to catch the inconsistency as Romney then segued into a reprimand, accusing Gingrich of being “a little over the top.”
Gingrich was incredulous: “You think my rhetoric was over the top, but your ads were totally reasonable?”
Romney repeated his by-now familiar defense: “I didn't write the ads.”
McClatchy Tribune News Service
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.