Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Rancor Between Gingrich and Romney Spills Over in Debate

Manchester, New Hampshire – Tensions between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney finally spilled onto the debate stage Sunday morning when moderator David Gregory gave Gingrich the opportunity to call Romney a liar. Perhaps without meaning to, Gingrich ended up catching Romney in a lie moments later. In campaigning for the Iowa caucuses, Gingrich complained that Romney should have interceded with a super PAC run by former Romney staffers and urged it to stop running vicious ads against the former House speaker. Romney often replied that he had no control over the super PAC, and that, in fact, it was illegal for him to coordinate with the group. To which Gingrich often said there is nothing to prevent Romney from publicly disavowing the group, Restore Our Future. To which Romney often replied: This is the big leagues. If you can't stand the heat, etc.

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

Manchester, New Hampshire – Tensions between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney finally spilled onto the debate stage Sunday morning when moderator David Gregory gave Gingrich the opportunity to call Romney a liar. Perhaps without meaning to, Gingrich ended up catching Romney in a lie moments later.

In campaigning for the Iowa caucuses, Gingrich complained that Romney should have interceded with a super PAC run by former Romney staffers and urged it to stop running vicious ads against the former House speaker. Romney often replied that he had no control over the super PAC, and that, in fact, it was illegal for him to coordinate with the group. To which Gingrich often said there is nothing to prevent Romney from publicly disavowing the group, Restore Our Future. To which Romney often replied: This is the big leagues. If you can't stand the heat, etc.

Sunday morning in Concord, N.H., Gregory focused on the disagreement. He noted that a former Gingrich campaign spokesman had launched a pro-Gingrich super PAC and was preparing to launch an attack against Romney, calling him a “predator” for killing jobs when he led Bain Capital, the private equity firm that enriched him before he entered politics.

“You would have to say that Bain at times engaged in behavior where they looted a company leaving behind 1,700 people,” said Gingrich.

“You have agreed with the characterization that Governor Romney is a liar,” said Gregory. “Look at him now; do you stand by that claim?”

“Sure,” replied Gingrich, not missing a beat.

In previous debates, the “Not Romney” candidates, when offered a chance to slam the front-runner, have often backpedaled. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty provided perhaps the best example of that kind of wimping out last summer. Pawlenty, who is now supporting Romney, had attacked him for instituting universal health care in Massachusetts, calling it “Obamneycare.” But when asked to say it to Romney's face on the debate stage, Pawlenty refused.

Here, two days before the New Hampshire primary, no one was pulling a Pawlenty.

However, Gingrich handed Romney an opening to repeat charges against him that were hammered home in the negative ads.

“Governor,” Gingrich told Romney, “I wish you would calmly and clearly state that it is your former staff running the PAC, it is your millionaire friends giving to the PAC, and you know some of the ads are untrue. Just say that straightforward.”

Romney, unfazed: “Of course it's former people of mine. Of course it's people who support me. They wouldn't be putting money into a PAC that supports me if they weren't people who support me,” he said.

Then, Romney told what can only be described as an untruth.

“And as regards to their ads,” he said, “I haven't seen them.”

Yet, seconds later, he added, “But let me tell you this, the ad I saw said you were forced out of the speakership. That was correct. It said that you sat down with Nancy Pelosi and argued for a climate change bill. That was correct. It said that you called Paul Ryan's plan to provide Medicare reform a right wing social engineering plan. It said that as part of an ethics investigation, that you had to reimburse some $300,000.”

Gingrich did not appear to catch the inconsistency as Romney then segued into a reprimand, accusing Gingrich of being “a little over the top.”

Gingrich was incredulous: “You think my rhetoric was over the top, but your ads were totally reasonable?”

Romney repeated his by-now familiar defense: “I didn't write the ads.”

McClatchy Tribune News Service

Trump is silencing political dissent. We appeal for your support.

Progressive nonprofits are the latest target caught in Trump’s crosshairs. With the aim of eliminating political opposition, Trump and his sycophants are working to curb government funding, constrain private foundations, and even cut tax-exempt status from organizations he dislikes.

We’re concerned, because Truthout is not immune to such bad-faith attacks.

We can only resist Trump’s attacks by cultivating a strong base of support. The right-wing mediasphere is funded comfortably by billionaire owners and venture capitalist philanthropists. At Truthout, we have you.

We’re in the midst of a fundraiser, and as of right now, we have until midnight to raise $10,000. Please take a meaningful action in the fight against authoritarianism: make a one-time or monthly donation to Truthout. If you have the means, please dig deep.