Part of the Series
Russia's War on Ukraine in an Age of Escalating Imperial Tensions
Despite international calls for a holiday ceasefire, the Russian military launched massive missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian towns and energy infrastructure this week, killing several civilians and robbing millions more of heat and light as the new year approaches.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is clearly punishing Ukrainians for resisting his invasion and locking his forces in a bloody war inching towards Russia’s border. However, Putin was already planning to leave portions of Ukraine in the dark during the freezing winter months long before his troops stormed across the border in February.
The Kremlin’s plan for taking over the Ukrainian government and “subjugating” the population offers a glimpse at what life would be like today had resistance failed and Kyiv fell in the early days of the war. The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), a think tank with access to British military intelligence, recently reported that an increasingly isolated Putin and a small inner circle originally planned to starve rebellious regions of Ukraine of electricity, water and financing after overtaking the central government and arresting or killing top officials. In Parliament, the pro-Russian faction would form a “Movement for Peace” and outlaw resistance. Any region that continued to rebel would suffer power outages and be cut off from the national banking system.
The process of installing a pro-Russian regime would have been ugly, complete with show trials and executions of pro-Western activists and top Ukrainian political leaders, according to the report. Other Ukrainians would be intimidated into submission at “filtration camps” designed to root out potential resisters, a brutal practice now infamous for terrorizing civilians in areas of Luhansk and Donbas occupied by Russia.
Russia assumed that a lightning blitz across Ukraine and the quick capture of Kyiv would shock the population and leave the United States and its European allies with few options for international intervention. Indeed, Russian forces outnumbered Ukrainian troops 12 to 1 in areas north of Kyiv during the early days of the failed campaign to topple the government, but Ukrainians exploited a series of tactical blunders and pushed the Russians back.
Putin’s plan for subjugating Ukraine was based on faulty intelligence and several assumptions that simply did not pan out, according to the report. Putin’s inner circle assumed some parts of Ukraine, particularly in the Russian-speaking east, would be easily pacified as local leaders were coerced or killed and pro-Russians rallied to the cause. Meanwhile, what was left of the Ukrainian military would be bogged down in the Donbas region, where Russia is currently defending annexed territory despite embarrassing retreats and an incredible loss of life.
Controlling access to heat in the winter months would be an effective means of controlling the rest of Ukraine’s “apathetic majority,” the Russians assumed, and resistance in anti-Russian regions could be snuffed out as temperatures plunged over the coming winter.
Now that winter has come, but Putin’s scheme for taking Kyiv and occupying Ukraine did not work out as planned. On a military-strategic level, the invasion is considered an international embarrassment. Still, Russia is resorting to many of the same tactics laid out in its original plan for taking Kyiv, including the detention, torture and execution of local leaders and suspected resisters in occupied territories, as well as attacks on energy infrastructure needed for daily life.
Seizing nuclear power plants that supply about 60 percent of Ukraine’s electricity was a key part of Putin’s plan, both to control the power supply and blackmail European countries with the threat of a nuclear accident if they were to intervene, according to RUSI. Today, Russia continues to control the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in a portion of occupied southern Ukraine, where Moscow and Kyiv have blamed each other for shelling that had shut down the plant several times and alarmed the world.
Ukrainian authorities reported blackouts across the country on Thursday after a barrage of missile strikes left several people injured ahead of New Year’s celebrations. Authorities reported that 40 percent of Kyiv and 90 percent of Lviv, two of the nation’s major cities under Ukrainian control, were without power as of Thursday. Ukrainians reacted again with anger and defiance, adding the holiday attacks on the power grid to a long list of alleged Russian war crimes that have emerged as a major roadblock to peace. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently accused Putin of using the freezing winter weather as a “weapon of mass destruction.”
Ukrainian forces claimed to have shot down 54 of the 69 missiles fired by Russia on Thursday, although these numbers are not independently confirmed. In a statement, the Ukrainian Defense Ministry said the “Russian terrorists” saved one of their largest missile attacks since the invasion for the last days of the year.
“They dream that Ukrainians will celebrate the New Year in darkness and cold,” the ministry said on Twitter. “But they cannot defeat the Ukrainian people.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.