As the United States Senate on Saturday voted to advance a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package, progressive lawmakers warned that they will not vote for the proposed legislation if it does not adequately fund human needs such as healthcare, housing, and climate action.
Saturday’s 67-27 Senate cloture vote on the 2,700-page Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (pdf) overcame a major barrier to the measure’s passage, although it was unclear when the Senate would hold a final vote on the bill.
“We can get this done the easy way or the hard way,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor before the vote. “In either case, the Senate will stay in session until we finish our work. It’s up to my Republican colleagues how long it takes.”
The deal — which falls short of the $2.25 trillion originally proposed in President Joe Biden’s American Jobs Plan, and is far less than the $10 trillion that progressives say should be spent — includes $550 billion in new infrastructure funding, including for roads and bridges, public transport, railways, broadband internet, port and airport upgrades, power and water system improvements, and environmental remediation.
Notably absent from the deal are progressive agenda items including a 7% corporate tax hike, Medicaid expansion, workforce development, and, critically, measures to address the climate crisis.
Biden took to Twitter Saturday to tout the deal:
We can’t just build back to the way things were before COVID-19, we have to build back better. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal and my Build Back Better plan will grow our economy, and create an average of 2 million good-paying jobs every year over the next decade.
— President Biden (@POTUS) August 7, 2021
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal is a historic, once-in-a-generation investment in our nation’s infrastructure. It will create good-paying, union jobs repairing our roads and bridges, replacing lead pipes, and building energy transmission lines.
We can’t afford not to do it.
— President Biden (@POTUS) August 7, 2021
Addressing the bill’s climate shortcomings, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse tweeted Saturday that “the plan is to get this bill passed and focus on the reconciliation package next. That’s where the big climate provisions will be.”
Democrats plan to use the reconciliation process to thwart a Republican filibuster of $3.5 trillion in additional spending on progressive priorities including climate action, Medicare expansion, free community college, universal pre-K, and paid family leave, to be funded by tax hikes on corporations and the wealthy.
Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) last month called the more ambitious progressive proposal “the most significant piece of legislation… since the Great Depression.”
Progressive lawmakers and advocates have lamented what they say are the bipartisan deal’s many inadequacies, with the Congressional Progressive Caucus vowing Saturday to oppose any bill that does not include funding for climate and social agenda items.
Since this infrastructure process began, we've been fighting for it to include 5 things:
✔️Affordable housing
✔️Care economy
✔️Medicare expansion
✔️Climate action
✔️CitizenshipWe're not backing down now. If the bill doesn't fund these sufficiently, it's not getting our votes.
— Progressive Caucus (@USProgressives) August 7, 2021
As Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said earlier this week, “If the bipartisan bill isn’t passed with a reconciliation package that has our popular priorities, we’re not voting for it.”
Appearing on Democracy Now! earlier this week, Jacobin staff writer Branko Marcetic said that “the bipartisan bill, by virtue of having to negotiate with the Republicans, who, of course, are climate deniers and… are captured by corporate interests, including fossil fuels, of course, they do not want a whole host of climate measures in there that are going to compete with those industries or that will… eventually phase them out.”
“So, a lot of that stuff has been stripped down,” Marcetic added. “The clean energy standard, which was meant to be one of the cornerstones of transitioning the United States’ electricity grid away from fossil fuels and to renewable energy, that’s out of the bill.”
As The Intercept reported earlier this week, the bipartisan deal includes $25 billion in potential new fossil fuel subsidies.
According to the outlet:
The bill includes billions of dollars for carbon capture, utilization, and storage; hydrogen fuel made from natural gas; and “low emissions buses” that could run on fuels including hydrogen and natural gas. It also encourages subsidies that go unquantified in the legislation, for example urging states to waive property taxes for pipelines to transport captured carbon.
Progressives are also seething at a Republican amendment that would increase Pentagon funding by $50 billion.
Demand that no Pentagon $ be included in the infrastructure bill!! https://t.co/hcoRRW79o1
— Medea Benjamin (@medeabenjamin) August 7, 2021
Marcetic warned of the potential consequences facing Democrats ahead of the 2022 midterm elections if they do not fight for the provisions in the more ambitious $3.5 trillion proposal.
“It’s going to be very difficult for Democrats to actually hold the House and the Senate,” he told Democracy Now!. “If this doesn’t get passed, it will be looked at as a massive missed opportunity that we will really regret, I think, in years to come.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.