Part of the Series
Gas Rush: Fracking in Depth
The number of Americans who say they want more regulation of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, outnumber those who want less regulation by a three-to-one margin, according to a Bloomberg poll released Friday.
Sixty-five percent of 1,002 adults polled this month favored more regulation of the natural gas drilling practice, while 18 percent want less and 17 percent aren’t sure.
The ongoing natural gas boom has boosted domestic production, reduced prices for consumers and created 600,000 jobs, according to Bloomberg, but the impacts of fracking – especially on drinking water supplies – have made it one of the nation’s most divisive and talked-about environmental issues.
Fracking involves pumping millions of gallons of chemical-laced freshwater, often taken from local rivers and lakes, deep underground to break up rock and release gas. The current gas boom is partially fueled by new fracking techniques that can access more reserves, but have been linked to groundwater contamination across the country.
Fracking regulation has been left up to the states and the industry enjoys little federal oversight, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed emissions and wastewater treatment rules and is conducting a nationwide study on the impacts of fracking that could lead to more federal regulation. The preliminary findings are due out by the end of the year.
In his State of the Union address, President Obama said he wants to expand gas drilling on public lands to boost economic fuel production. Obama said drilling should be done safely and he supports new rules, such as requiring fracking operators drilling on public lands to disclose the chemicals they pump in the ground.
Voters also seem to be finding a middle ground between the “drill baby drill” mentality and simply banning fracking, as some environmental groups have suggested.
Consider Ohio, where a pro-industry governor recently signed legislation allowing drilling in state parks as the gas industry expands drilling of the state’s shale reserves. Ohioans say fracking will breath economic life into the state – 85 percent say fracking will create jobs, and 64 percent say the economic benefits outweigh environmental concerns – but 72 percent of Ohio voters want to stop fracking until there are further studies on its environmental impact, according to a Quinnipiac University poll.
The Quinnipiac polled Ohioans from January 9 to 16, just a couple weeks after a fracking wastewater injection well made headlines after it caused a 4.0 magnitude earthquake in the Youngstown area. Last week, Ohio regulators confirmed that a nearby fracking wastewater injection well, where millions of gallons of fracking wastewater are pumped underground, caused 12 earthquakes in 2011.
In Pennsylvania, where well blowouts and water contamination have marred the industry’s exploitation of a massive shale gas reserve, 62 percent of voters still say the economic benefits of fracking outweigh environmental concerns, according to a September 2011 Quinnipiac poll. Pennsylvanians want a piece of the pie though, with 64 percent of voters saying they support a new tax on drilling companies, including 51 percent of Republicans.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.