Skip to content Skip to footer

Poll Shows Voters Support Abolishing Private Insurers If They Can Keep Providers

The majority of voters support a Medicare for All plan that eliminates private insurers.

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks while introducing the Medicare for All Act of 2019 with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Sen. Jeff Merkley during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on April 9, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

Bolstering single-payer proponents’ argument that Americans like and want to keep their doctors and hospitals, not their private insurance companies, a survey released Tuesday found that the majority of voters support a Medicare for All plan that eliminates private insurers if they can hold on to their healthcare providers.

Conducted by Morning Consult and Politico after the first Democratic presidential debates, the poll (pdf) found 55 percent of voters back a Medicare for All system that “diminishes the role of private insurers but allows you to keep your doctor and hospital.”

According to the survey, 78 percent of Democrats, 56 percent of independents, and 26 percent of Republicans — averaging 55 percent overall — support a Medicare for All plan that phases out private insurance and allows them to keep their doctors and hospitals.

In a statement to Morning Consult, Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) presidential campaign said “[t]hese numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don’t like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals.”

“Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you,” the campaign said, “Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures — change jobs, start a family, start a business — and keep their doctor.”

As Morning Consult’s Yusra Murad noted, the new data shows that voters’ concerns about virtually abolishing the private insurance industry “can be mitigated by clarifying that losing private insurers would not affect access to preferred providers.”

The issue of whether Americans like their private insurance companies arose during the second night of the Democratic presidential debates last Thursday, when Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) — an opponent of Medicare for All — expressed support for creating a public option while upholding private insurance “for others that want to keep it.”

Sanders, the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate, responded by pointing out that Medicare “is the most popular health insurance program in the country.”

“People don’t like their private insurance companies,” Sanders said. “They like their doctors and hospitals. Under our plan, people can go to any doctor or any hospital they want. We will substantially lower the cost of health care because we stop the greed of the insurance companies.”

As the Washington Posts’s Paul Waldeman noted in a column in April, under Sanders’s Medicare for All plan, “You wouldn’t have to worry about losing your doctor, because with the possible exception of ‘concierge’ practices serving the rich, every doctor would accept it; there would be no more networks that don’t include the doctors you want to see.”

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $145,000 in one-time donations and to add 1489 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy