Democrats could drive support in key swing states this fall if Vice President Kamala Harris calls for an end to weapons transfers to Israel amid its genocide in Gaza, new polling finds even as the Biden administration doubles down on its military support of Israel.
The latest Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) Policy Project/YouGov poll released Wednesday finds that large proportions of voters in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona say that they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic presidential candidate in November if the candidate came out for an arms embargo on Israel — and that, by contrast, there is essentially no risk of losing voters if they did so.
The polling of nearly 1,500 likely Democratic and independent voters found that 34 percent said they would be more likely to vote for the nominee if they pledged to withhold weapons to Israel, while only 7 percent said they’d be less likely.
Young voters, a key demographic for Democrats, are the most supportive of the call to end the military support for Israel, with 60 percent of those aged 18 to 29 saying they’d be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if they made that vow, versus only 7 percent who said the opposite.
Support jumps among those who say they are undecided in this election, with a whopping 57 percent saying they’re more likely to back the nominee if they make the pledge, with zero percent saying that they would be less likely to vote for them. This margin is the most prominent in Pennsylvania — one of the most important states in the presidential election, with 19 electoral votes.
By contrast, if the nominee were to continue President Joe Biden’s policy of nearly unconditional support of Israel, 60 percent of undecided voters say they would be less likely to vote for the nominee, while 24 percent of respondents overall agreed that it would negatively sway their opinion. Only 6 percent of all respondents said they’d be more likely to vote for the nominee if they continued Biden’s policies.
The polling sends a clear message to the Harris campaign that they can boost their chances of winning the election this fall if Harris pivots away from the Biden administration’s stance on Gaza. It is the same message that anti-Zionist activists have been attempting to convey to Democrats for months as the Biden administration has given Israel a near carte blanche on its ability to carry out a campaign of extermination in Gaza.
However, the polling finds that support for Palestinian rights among these voters goes even further than the situation of Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
Forty percent of respondents also said that they would be more likely than not to vote for the Democratic nominee if they supported ending Israel’s military occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, while 41 percent said the same if the nominee called for an end to Israel’s apartheid. This stands in stark contrast to the roughly 5 percent who said they’d be less likely to choose the Democratic nominee in those circumstances.
“This polling clearly shows that if the Democrats want Vice President Harris to be the strongest nominee possible going into November, then they should be demanding that President Biden stop the flow of weapons to Israel and secure a permanent ceasefire immediately,” said IMEU Policy Project Executive Director Margaret DeReus in a statement.
“Not only are these policies popular, but they actually move voters from the ‘undecided’ or ‘not voting’ column and into the Democrats’ column in the states Democrats will need to win,” DeReus went on.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.