Skip to content Skip to footer

Please, Enough With the Partisan Chain E-mail

For five years, Joyce and John Good silently tolerated angry partisan e-mails forwarded by family and friends. They even ignored the steady vitriol flowing from the husband and wife they’d known for 40 years. “We’d raised our children together,” Joyce said of the couple. “We never talked politics. We’d just say, ‘We’re bipartisan.’ But they started sending us these awful e-mails, and it was clear they assumed we agreed with them.”

For five years, Joyce and John Good silently tolerated angry partisan e-mails forwarded by family and friends.

They even ignored the steady vitriol flowing from the husband and wife they’d known for 40 years.

“We’d raised our children together,” Joyce said of the couple. “We never talked politics. We’d just say, ‘We’re bipartisan.’ But they started sending us these awful e-mails, and it was clear they assumed we agreed with them.”

The Goods, who live in a small town east of Cleveland, cherished the friendship, so they just hit delete. Over and over.

Then Barack Obama ran for president.

“This past election brought out such an anger,” Joyce said. “It’s as if our country hit a boiling point.”

The subject line of their friends’ e-mail read, “VP of Procter & Gamble Speaks Out.”

I know this e-mail practically by heart. As a columnist, I’m on the receiving end of a lot of partisan junk mail, and this one has been a running hit with many conservatives ever since Obama’s election.

“An Open Letter to President Obama” is attributed to Lou Pritchett, who retired from P&G more than 20 years ago. Pritchett confirmed via e-mail that he was the author, proudly adding, “Although I never heard from (The New York Times) or Obama the letter has had over 6 million hits on the internet.”

The letter begins:

Dear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

On and on it goes. For the Goods, it went too far. They stewed for five days and then sent a simple request: “Please do not send us any more political emails. Joyce and John.”

Their friends cut off communication for months. Finally, the Goods called them to hash it out.

“The wife said she was very hurt,” Joyce said. “I said to her, ‘How do you think it made me feel?'”

Joyce reached out to me with a question: “How do we stop friends and family members from sending these e-mails? They’re so divisive for the country, and they hurt a lot of people.”

The Goods are not alone in their distaste for partisan e-mail that traffics in rants and rage. In the nearly eight years that I’ve been a columnist, I’ve received countless messages from readers despairing over relationships that have splintered and exploded because someone thought it’d be funny to hit “send.” And I’ve received enough snarky e-mails about George W. Bush — most questioning his mental acuity — to know that uncivil discourse is a bipartisan hobby.

So many of us wrestle with unsolicited hate mail. It likely will amuse some of my conservative critics to know I get far-right missives from relatives who are apoplectic over the immutable reality of our shared gene pool. One even unfriended me on Facebook. That hurt.

Some are hard-wired to rebut these e-mails, responding with links to fact-checking sites — such as Snopes.com and PolitiFact — and engaging in tit for tat until their fingers catch fire.

Some, such as the Goods, send earnest pleas for it to end. A lot, I suspect, do the grr-and-grind: They click on the delete button but still churn long after the e-mail has evaporated.

Most of us would like to lose the e-mails but keep the people who send them. So here’s a thought. Next time someone you like sends an e-mail you hate, just send this column to them.

I’ll take it from here:

Hey.

That awful e-mail you sent?

Please don’t do that again.

Hopefully yours,

A fellow American.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House, “Life Happens” and “… and His Lovely Wife.” She is a featured contributor in a recently released book by Bloomsbury, “The Speech: Race and Barack Obama’s ‘A More Perfect Union.'” To find out more about Connie Schultz ([email protected].

Copyright 2010 Creators.com

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy