Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Pennsylvania Seeks to “Reprioritize” Funding Away From Planned Parenthood

Anti-choice politicians in the state of Pennsylvania are attempting to change the way family planning and health care funds for low income women are allocated, putting Planned Parenthood affiliates last in line. Via PennLive: [Republican Rep. Daryl] Metcalfe introduced House Bill 2405 that would maintain the state funding for preventative health screenings but give priority … Continued

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

Anti-choice politicians in the state of Pennsylvania are attempting to change the way family planning and health care funds for low income women are allocated, putting Planned Parenthood affiliates last in line.

Via PennLive:

[Republican Rep. Daryl] Metcalfe introduced House Bill 2405 that would maintain the state funding for preventative health screenings but give priority it to organizations that provide comprehensive care and not ones he said whose primary function is to conduct abortions…

“Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortionists,” Metcalfe said. “The Whole Woman’s Health Funding Priorities Act will structure the law in a way that funding for women’s health will go to providers that are actually focused on providing care for women rather than facilities that are focused on ending the lives of the unborn.”

Pennsylvania isn’t the first state to attempt to “re-prioritize” the funding in a hope that it will run out before it can ever get to Planned Parenthood affiliates and other groups that provide abortions. Ohio recently proposed the same plan as part of its biannual budget, although it was eventually stripped from the bill. It has now been proposed again as a stand alone bill that is pending in a House committee.

The new “re-prioritize” agenda is a clever way to get around the threatened administrative lawsuits that come with declaring Planned Parenthood exempt from inclusion when it comes to family planning funding. This way, a state is unlikely to be sued for discriminating against a particular entity, which is what got the state of Texas in trouble when it pulled funding to the reproductive health provider via its Women’s Health Program.

Should the bill pass without fanfare, expect more states to do the same.

A terrifying moment. We appeal for your support.

In the last weeks, we have witnessed an authoritarian assault on communities in Minnesota and across the nation.

The need for truthful, grassroots reporting is urgent at this cataclysmic historical moment. Yet, Trump-aligned billionaires and other allies have taken over many legacy media outlets — the culmination of a decades-long campaign to place control of the narrative into the hands of the political right.

We refuse to let Trump’s blatant propaganda machine go unchecked. Untethered to corporate ownership or advertisers, Truthout remains fearless in our reporting and our determination to use journalism as a tool for justice.

But we need your help just to fund our basic expenses. Over 80 percent of Truthout’s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors.

Truthout has launched a fundraiser to add 432 new monthly donors in the next 7 days. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger one-time gift, Truthout only works with your support.