Washington – The House of Representatives may take a politically explosive vote before November’s congressional elections on whether to extend tax cuts for individuals who earn less than $200,000 a year in gross adjusted income and joint filers who make less than $250,000, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday.
On Thursday night, Senate Democrats delayed a tax cut vote until after the election, but many Democrats are still pushing to get lawmakers on the record about whether and how to extend the George W. Bush-era tax reductions.
President Barack Obama and Democratic congressional leaders want to extend the 2001 and 2003 cuts, but not for higher-income Americans. With the economy struggling out of a deep recession, however, Republicans and many moderate Democrats prefer to extend all the Bush reductions, at least for a while.
The public is divided. A McClatchy-Marist poll earlier this week found that Americans are evenly split on whether Congress should extend all the tax cuts or retain only those for households that earn less than $250,000 while allowing taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent to rise.
The top two income-tax rates are now 33 and 35 percent. If nothing were done, they’d rise to 36 and 39.6 percent next year.
The pre-election tax cut debate appeared to be over Thursday night, when it became clear that the Senate didn’t have the 60 votes necessary to cut off extended debate. Democrats control 59 Senate seats, and moderate Democrats balked at raising taxes on anyone during the economic slump.
As a result, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley, issued a statement that said, “Democrats believe we must permanently extend tax cuts for the middle class before they expire at the end of the year, and we will.”
However, he added, “Unfortunately, to this point we have received no cooperation from Republicans to do so. . . . We will come back in November and stay in session as long as it takes to get this done.”
Friday, though, Pelosi, a California Democrat, reopened the door to a vote, at least in the House.
“We will retain the right to proceed as we choose. We’ll take it one day at a time,” she said when asked about the possibility of a vote.
One scenario that’s under consideration is to bring up the middle class cuts under a procedure that would limit debate and require the approval of two-thirds of those voting. Democrats control 255 House seats, Republicans, 178.
Some Democrats think that such a vote would put Republicans on the spot because they wouldn’t want to vote for raising taxes on the middle class.
However, such a vote could hurt centrist Democrats, many of whom are facing tough re-election battles. Earlier this month, 31 House Democrats wrote their leaders urging that the cuts be extended for everyone, and they’re wary that their GOP rivals may accuse them of wanting to raise taxes, even on the wealthy.
The moderates’ letter, signed at the top by Rep. Jim Matheson of Utah, says, “In recent weeks, we have heard from a diverse spectrum of economists, small business owners and families who have voiced concerns that raising any taxes right now could negatively impact economic growth.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.