Skip to content Skip to footer

Pakistan Violence: Sparked by Karachi’s 300th Assassination This Year

Karachi, Pakistan – The murder of a Pakistani politician on Monday sparked deadly riots in Pakistan’s southern port city of Karachi in which 35 people were killed and at least 80 wounded.

Karachi, Pakistan – The murder of a Pakistani politician on Monday sparked deadly riots in Pakistan’s southern port city of Karachi in which 35 people were killed and at least 80 wounded.

The death of Raza Haider, a member of parliament and senior leader of the secular Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) party, is the latest and most high-profile in a series of political assassinations that have deepened ethnic tensions in Pakistan’s financial capital. Over 300 people have been assassinated for ethnic or political reasons in Karachi this year. But now, the government claims that militant groups are behind Haider’s assassination.

That may be the case, but Pakistani society is seeing a growing degree of both religious and ethnic polarization. There have been attacks by militants on Sufi shrines in other parts of the country. And while retaliation has been limited so far, there were signs of further trouble in the overnight rioting. The MQM represents Karachi’s majority Urdu-speaking population and are rivals for political leadership and land ownership with minority Pashtuns who have migrated from northwestern Pakistan seeking employment.

Leaders of the MQM claimed that activists of the Awami National Party (ANP) – who are primarily Pashtuns – were behind the assassination. According to the police, the majority of those killed or injured during retaliatory attacks on Monday night belonged to the Pashtun community.

Pakistan Interior Minister Rehman Malik called Haider’s assassination a “trap to destabilize Pakistan” and accused the banned sectarian groups Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LJ) of organizing the murder to “destabilize Karachi.” Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a police official with the Crime Investigation Department said that three suspects in the killing have confessed ties to the SSP.

MQM leaders say Haider’s death is evidence of cooperation between the ANP, its Pashtun supporters and extremists. “It doesn’t matter whether Haider’s killers were from sectarian groups or with the Taliban; the fact is the terrorists are enjoying the patronage of the ANP and they are now jointly targeting the MQM,” claims Syed Haider Abbas Rizvi, MQM’s deputy parliamentary leader in the National Assembly.

To support his argument Rizvi points to the capture of high-ranking Taliban commanders in Pashtun-dominated areas, among them Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, who was arrested in Karachi in February. “Militants with commercial interests and Pashtun land mafias have allied on the basis of financial gains,” he says.

Since 2008, Pakistani police and intelligence agencies have claimed that the Taliban raise funds for militants based along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Karachi. The MQM has repeatedly warned of the danger of the “Talibanization” of Karachi’s Pashtun community. Both the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban draw most of their members from the Pashtun ethnic group.

The ANP vehemently denies any involvement with extremist or militant groups. “After [the militants] killed our brothers and colleagues by the hundreds in Swat [and other parts of north-west Pakistan], how could we ever join hands with them?” asks Amin Khattak, general secretary of the ANP’s Sindh chapter. Khattak agrees, however, that Haider’s assassination is an attempt to stoke ethnic tensions among Karachi’s political parties. “Rather than play the blame game,” he suggests, “we should identify the culprits and hold them accountable.”

The alleged involvement of sectarian militant groups in Karachi’s ethnic politics is a new development, although these groups have long been present in the city. The SSP and LJ were held responsible for the bombing of a Shiite religious procession in Karachi on Dec. 30 last year.

Since then, dozens of members of the minority Shiite sect have been killed in incidents of sectarian violence.

“The government has always known of the activities of groups such as the SSP in Karachi,” adds Khattak. “If they thought they would target the MQM [which is a coalition partner], they should have clamped down on them by now.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.