Skip to content Skip to footer

PA Supreme Court Expresses Doubts Over State’s Anti-Abortion Medicaid Law

The state’s high court ordered a lower court to re-examine the legality of a 1982 anti-abortion statute.

A woman holds a placard saying 'abortion is healthcare' during an abortion rights rally in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, on July 3, 2022.

The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued a ruling on Monday that may pave the way to undoing a 42-year-old state law that forbids the state’s Medicaid program from funding abortion care.

In a 3-2 decision by the court, the justices ruled that a lower court had to re-examine the legality of the 1982 Abortion Control Act, which only allows state Medicaid funds to pay for abortions in cases of rape, incest and when it is deemed necessary to save the life of a pregnant person. The lower court had initially stated that it wouldn’t rule on whether the law was congruent with the state constitution.

Abortion in Pennsylvania is currently recognized as a right up to 23 weeks of pregnancy, with limited exceptions allowed after that point. But for those who are on the state Medicaid program, called Medical Assistance, abortions are not paid for, and must be paid out of pocket by recipients because of the Abortion Care Act. Plaintiffs in the case, represented by the Women’s Law Project, said the state’s refusal to pay for abortions but willingness to provide other reproductive options within Medical Assistance amounted to sex discrimination.

Federal law prohibits the use of federal dollars to provide abortion coverage to those who are part of the Medicaid program. However, states can add additional funds to their programs themselves in order to provide that coverage, which 17 states currently do.

Two of the state Supreme Court justices indicated that abortion is a fundamental right under the state constitution. A third justice called their analysis an “incredibly insightful” opinion, but stopped short of endorsing it, noting that the case before them didn’t require an answer on that question.

Still, the majority opinion, which now forces the lower court to consider the law’s application and its constitutionality, leaves little doubt that it could be upended sometime in the future.

“The right to reproductive autonomy is the right to self-determination. While the right has been presented to us in terms of making the decision ‘to choose to end or continue a pregnancy,’ it implicates the broader proposition that individuals have the right to make important reproductive healthcare decisions — a gender neutral right to make decisions without governmental intrusion into those private matters that play a defining role in the course of a lifetime,” the court said in its ruling. “Our Constitution guarantees equality in the exercise of this right. The right of all individuals to be left alone to pursue happiness and enjoy liberty is central to our compact with the government.”

The lower court will now re-examine the legality of the law. Abortion rights activists lauded the ruling, describing it as the next step toward ensuring that Medical Assistance participants can obtain the procedure.

“Even though a majority of the Court didn’t hold there is a fundamental right to abortion in Pennsylvania, this issue will come back to the Court in the future, and we now have a great building block to accomplish that goal,” said David S. Cohen, constitutional law professor at Drexel Kline School of Law.

“The rights of Pennsylvanians are due to all Pennsylvanians, not just those wealthy enough to afford them…. Today’s ruling is the first step toward ending discriminatory access to care, and we remain committed to removing every barrier to abortion,” said Signe Espinoza, executive director of Planned Parenthood PA Advocates.

Women’s Law Project co-executive director Susan J. Frietsche also weighed in on the ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

“The Court gave our clients an enormous victory,” Frietsche said in a press release. “We are still determining next steps, but we are confident the Medicaid abortion ban will be consigned to the scrapheap of history very soon.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy