When the administration launched its foreclosure prevention program, it committed to spend up to $75 billion. By the end of March, more than a year later, only about $242 million had actually been paid out.
That number is sure to rise, but it’s a testament to how slowly the program has progressed. The low total is a direct result of the low number of permanent mortgage modifications so far: 228,000 as of the end of March. About 1.2 million homeowners have begun trial modifications, but many have been stranded in the trials for longer than the three months they were designed to last. About 158,000 have been dropped from the program, either because they couldn’t make the payments or because of disqualification.
The program provides incentives to mortgage servicers, investors, and homeowners to encourage modifications to more affordable monthly mortgage payments—but those incentives are paid out only when a modification becomes permanent.
The $242 million paid out as of the end of March came from a variety of sources. The Treasury Department itself had paid $91 million in incentive payments, while the now government-owned Fannie Mae had paid $116 million and Freddie Mac $35 million, according to the companies’ securities filings.
The Treasury funds come from the TARP bailout, of which $50 billion was originally set aside for this program. Fannie and Freddie have agreed to pay out the incentives related to loans that they own or guarantee, a toll that Treasury estimated at $25 billion. That’s how we get to $75 billion.
(Of course, Fannie and Freddie can make those payments only because of the support of the U.S. government. Their bailout toll recently rose to $145 billion. So, really, all of it is ultimately coming from the taxpayer.)
A report (PDF) last month by the special inspector general for the TARP said that about $68.4 million of the $91 million paid out so far under the TARP has gone to servicers, the banks and other companies that collect mortgage payments and handle modifications. (Bank of America, Chase Home Finance, and Wells Fargo are the largest.) The remainder of the money paid out went to investors: either a lending institution or investors in mortgage-backed securities. All of the funds paid by Fannie and Freddie have gone to servicers, because Fannie or Freddie own or guarantee the loans.
The program has a system of incentive payments (PDF). Servicers receive $1,000 immediately for completing each permanent modification, while Treasury compensates the investor for part of the payment reduction.
The government’s spending on the program is sure to rise for a number of reasons. The first is that some of the incentives are paid over time. For instance, the program also provides up to $5,000 in incentives to the homeowner, none of which have been paid out yet. If the homeowner remains current on the modified loan, the Treasury (or Fannie or Freddie) will pay to reduce the homeowner’s outstanding principal by $1,000 at the end of each year for five years.
The second is that the number of permanent modifications will continue to mount, even if at a disappointing rate. Whereas the administration has often touted a goal of helping 3 million to 4 million homeowners, it recently admitted a more modest goal of 1.5 million to 2 million permanent modifications.
The Treasury has also recently signed up servicers for two other programs. One will pay incentives to lower homeowners’ payments on second mortgages. The other offers incentives for servicers to execute “foreclosure alternatives” like a short sale (allowing the homeowner to sell the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount). It remains to be seen how successful those initiatives will be.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.