“There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen,” reads a quotation often attributed to Vladimir Lenin (although he may never have said it). Whoever came up with that sentence, it captures the past week perfectly — from the eruption of new legislation to the FBI visit of a former president’s home. Amid the blizzard of news and stunning revelation, one image will stay with me forever: Donald Trump, at his Bedminster club in New Jersey, watching the surveillance camera feed coming from inside his Florida home as federal agents searched Mar-a-Lago.
In the days since the federal search, Trump has been at great pains to whip his supporters and sycophants into a towering frenzy, and as “frenzy” is the default position for too many of them — especially in the media — it was not too much of a reach. All of a sudden there were Republican officeholders calling for the defunding, if not outright destruction, of the FBI. Cries of “totalitarian state” were raised, as Trump’s allies accused the FBI of being an arm of the president’s wrath. This is ironic, as that is what Trump tried to do with the FBI while he was in office.
More than anything, the call from all Trumpian points was, “Where’s the warrant?”
As the invective reached a furious peak, some were listening. Ricky Shiffer, a member of Trump’s Truth Social message board who attended the January 6 Capitol raid, attacked the FBI office in Cincinnati with a nail gun. “We must not tolerate this one,” he posted before his attack, which he did not survive. The overheated rhetoric in combination with Shiffer’s act of violence motivated the FBI to release a sternly worded denunciation. “Calls for violence against law enforcement are unacceptable,” reads the statement, “and should be condemned by all leaders. This is not a partisan or political issue. It is a matter of public safety and basic decency.”
We must pause at this juncture to note that although Donald Trump has clearly lost a step since leaving office, his grip on his base remains formidable. His King-Midas-in-reverse powers remain an astonishment: Only Trump could turn the Federal Bureau of Investigation into a building full of victims in need of rescue and succor from Big Daddy Garland. That’s some freaky magic, y’all.
Attorney General Garland, who I had recently taken to calling a perfectly named inert decorative object, took my snark this week and yeeted it up my left nostril. The Garland-approved, thoroughly unprecedented FBI visit to Mar-a-Lago at the beginning of all this was followed up last night by a press conference that belonged at the center table of the World Series of Poker.
Not only did Garland stand in front of his people, but he announced the Department of Justice was seeking the release of both the warrant and a basic list of what was found in the search, along with what crimes were potentially committed. If Trump wanted to fight this release, that was his right. In poker terms, Garland pushed his whole pile of chips into the center of the table, looked at Trump over the top of his reflector sunglasses, and waited.
Minutes later, The Washington Post reported that the feds at Mar-a-Lago were searching for highly classified documents pertaining to nuclear weapons. The New York Times rapidly followed up with additional reporting that the feds were concerned with the existence at Mar-a-Lago of “material from what the government calls ‘special access programs,’ a designation that is typically reserved for extremely sensitive operations carried out by the United States abroad or for closely held technologies and capabilities.”
Trump may think he can declassify anything he wants with a wave of his tiny hand, but this is simply not the case, especially with extremely classified material like nuclear data and the disposition of forces. There is a process to be followed to achieve such declassification, and Trump did not follow it before haring off with boxes potentially full of white-hot secrets.
The silence on the right that followed Garland and the Times and Post reports had its own mass and gravity. Republican heads clunked together from Bedminster to Orange County, California, all asking the same questions: Would releasing the warrant actually be harmful? Was he really sitting on a cache of nuke docs?
“Republicans around Trump initially thought the raid could help him politically,” reports the Post, “but they are now bracing for revelations that could be damaging.”
After a brief interlude spent cloistered with his lawyers, Trump heaved up and pushed his own chips to the center of the table. OF COURSE the warrant should be released. (He has a copy and could release it right now if he so chose.) The morning brought a tacky yet not-unexpected new line of defense: Trump called the whole thing a “hoax” while strongly suggesting the FBI had planted damning material during the search. The people who searched his home were “sleazy,” he said. The planted evidence accusation made the rounds on Fox News, though notably without the gusto it brought to the allegations launched before the Garland presser. Ever hear a forest filled with peeper frogs go silent when a predator comes by? Like that.
The warrant could be made public as early as 3 pm Eastern time today. “It’s unclear at this point how much information would be included in the documents, if made public, or if they would encompass an FBI affidavit that would presumably lay out a detailed factual basis for the search,” reports the Associated Press. “The department specifically requested the unsealing of the warrant as well as a property receipt listing the items that were seized, along with two unspecified attachments.”
Events on Friday afternoon may render that release moot; a great big leak may have done the job. The Wall Street Journal reports:
FBI agents who searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home Monday removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities. The FBI agents took around 20 boxes of items, binders of photos, a handwritten note and the executive grant of clemency for Mr. Trump’s ally Roger Stone, a list of items removed from the property shows. Also included in the list was information about the ‘President of France.’
The list includes references to one set of documents marked as ‘Various classified/TS/SCI documents,’ an abbreviation that refers to top-secret/sensitive compartmented information. It also says agents collected four sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret documents, and three sets of confidential documents.
In 2016, Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court was thwarted by Mitch McConnell. In 2021, he was named Attorney General by President Biden. In 2022, he is engaged in a bluff with a former president that could change the course of history. There are weeks when decades happen.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.