On June 26, the United States Supreme Court sent a redistricting challenge to Louisiana’s congressional maps back to a lower court, which had ruled the maps likely dilute the Black communities’ voting power. The decision paves the way for a second minority-majority district in Louisiana, something for which plaintiffs have advocated for months.
The decision — hailed by voting rights advocates in and outside of Louisiana — is part of a handful of decisions this summer that protect the voting franchise. Earlier this month, the court rejected redistricting lines in Alabama that advocates say amounted to racial gerrymandering. On June 27, the Supreme Court rejected the so-called “Independent State Legislature Theory” and upheld the checks and balances central to safeguarding democratic institutions in the U.S. Although many were poised for negative outcomes, the rulings strengthened our nation’s democracy.
We can extrapolate at least three lessons from these decisions. First, when organizers dare to consistently defend democracy, they position themselves to win. Regardless of how bleak things look, we can never resign ourselves to the status quo. If we continue to organize, we can make a difference for ourselves and future generations.
Next, these cases prove that the courts still play an important role in protecting our freedom to vote. We must continue to advocate for a judicial process that has proven to be the last line of defense for marginalized communities. From the civil rights movement to current times, communities of color have relied on the court system to defend and expand basic rights.
Finally, voters must use every tool at their disposal to protect democracy. From the courts to ballot initiatives to year-round organizing, we must be as dogged about protecting our democracy as authoritarian forces are about decimating it. That’s critical, especially in a place like Ohio that has been trending red for a while.
In Ohio, Republicans control all three branches of government. They can and often do draw district lines in a way that solidifies their hold on power. That makes it harder for communities of color to elect candidates that represent them. Until this obstacle is addressed, it may not matter how many people turn out and vote — some communities will struggle to elect candidates of their choice. It’s imperative that we not give up in the face of resistance but continue to organize and strategize, and refuse to believe all hope is lost.
Bills without Republican support do not pass in the Ohio legislature. Ohio is deeply partisan, meaning that issues aren’t considered on their merits but rather by the political party advancing the issue. One way to overcome that barrier has been ballot initiatives.
For about 100 years, Ohioans have used ballot measures to put issues that matter to their communities directly on the ballot. But on May 10, Republicans in the Ohio House of Representatives advanced a controversial proposal that will allow a small minority of voters (40 percent) to dictate what the majority of Ohioans want. Their proposal, Senate Joint Resolution 2, will go before voters as “Issue 1” in an August special election. The special election will happen even though Republicans previously sought to end costly, confusing, and difficult-to-administer August special elections in the state.
If Ohio’s Issue 1 passes in August, not only will Ohio Republicans have a stranglehold on all branches of our state government, they will also control the constitutional amendment process. That’s not good for Ohioans, and it’s disastrous for our democracy.
Now that the legislature is seeking to make it harder to get issues on the ballot, the stakes are even higher. But higher doesn’t mean insurmountable. That’s why my organization, the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, is working alongside the Ohio Unity Coalition, the Ohio NAACP, and the A. Philip Randolph Institute to organize our communities, turn them out to vote and encourage those who favor a fair and inclusive democracy to stand with us. We also continue to challenge Ohio’s illegal and unconstitutional redistricting maps.
Grassroots leaders in Ohio are fighting every day to protect the integrity of our democracy in Ohio. We will not tolerate a narrow vision of the U.S. that embraces just one community or one perspective. All must be welcome here. In a democracy, all people should have an equal chance of electing candidates of choice, advocating for policies that benefit the whole rather than a select few and making the state constitution responsive to the people.
We know that our fight is bigger than a single issue: voting rights, reproductive rights and campaigns to raise the minimum wage or ensure paid sick and family leave will all be sidelined if some voters are locked out of our democracy. Despite the current high court’s makeup, we must continue to organize, understanding that we can only lose when we refuse to fight.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.