After three police officers in New York City had consumed milkshakes that made them ill, police unions in the city alleged the incident was a purposeful “attack” on cops. But an investigation of the matter later found that it was accidental, not criminal.
Three officers on protest detail in New York City had visited a Shake Shack location and purchased milkshakes, later becoming sick and requiring visits to the hospital. The officers were released shortly after, but the Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York (NYC PBA), the largest union of police officers in New York, slammed the company for purportedly hurting the officers on purpose.
“When NYC police officers cannot even take [a] meal without coming under attack, it is clear that environment in which we work has deteriorated to a critical level,” NYC PBA said in a tweet on the matter. “We cannot afford to let our guard down for even a moment.”
Another New York police union, the Detectives’ Endowment Association, released a similar statement, claiming the officers were “intentionally poisoned” after initial reports of the incident came out.
Neither police union had evidence to back up their claims. Indeed, after NYPD conducted an investigation into the milkshake incident, it was determined on Tuesday morning that no criminal action had taken place. Instead, it appeared that a cleaning solution for the milkshake machine hadn’t been properly cleared out before the milkshakes began being served.
Both police unions have since issued retractions of their initial remarks, with NYC PBA recognizing that “no criminality” was evident. However, it appeared as though the backlash against Shake Shack had already begun, regardless of those retractions, due to the initial outrage over accusations levied onto the company.
Although Shake Shack — a $450 million corporation that was recently embroiled in a controversy over its acquisition of PPP loans — announced on Monday evening, before the investigation was concluded, that it was cooperating with police and “horrified” by the events, several users on social media accused the business of “attempted murder” and targeting of police in general. A #BoycottShakeShack hashtag was also created in response to the allegations by the police unions.
Even after news came out that it was an honest mistake, some users refused to believe it, continuing their crusade against the company even after the findings of the investigation were made public.
The initial statements from police unions in New York City over the accidental contamination of milkshakes are indicative of a regular practice by police officers across the country to perpetually play the role of victim. As Max Felker-Kantor, assistant professor of history and African American studies at Ball State University, pointed out in a Truthout article last week, most calls to reform or change the way police protection works are met with fierce opposition, often coupled with baseless attacks from the police toward critics or the community at large.
The police response to recent calls to defund police departments have been no different.
“Defunding the police is a critical step, but it will not be enough without recognizing how the police will use demands for systemic reform to frame themselves as the ‘victims’ in need of more support and power to maintain so-called law and order,” Felker-Kantor wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.