Skip to content Skip to footer

Norfolk Southern Used Sick Leave as Bargaining Chip to Erode Safety, Union Says

The company wanted to withhold sick leave unless the union agreed to support an industry-favored inspection system.

A Norfolk Southern train passes underneath a bridge on February 25, 2023, in East Palestine, Ohio.

When Norfolk Southern, the railroad company behind the crash in East Palestine, Ohio, finally offered to give its workers paid sick leave, its proposal came with a major caveat: the company must be allowed to campaign to erode safety regulations without union opposition.

In a letter sent on Wednesday to government officials, including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, an official for a major rail union — representing roughly 3,000 Norfolk Southern workers — said that the company had recently said it would only agree to give workers paid sick leave if the union withdrew a letter of opposition to its new experimental inspection system that would make train operation more dangerous for workers and communities like East Palestine.

Norfolk Southern further said that the union must issue a letter to federal regulators in support of the company’s inspection system in order to obtain the benefit for workers. The proposal came as negotiations between the company and the union on the sick leave issue had stalled, and felt like an “underhanded” attempt by the company to yet again prioritize profits over worker safety, the letter said.

Norfolk Southern and other rail companies have been pushing regulators at the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to reinstitute a program for automated track inspections. Though rail unions have said that they’re not explicitly against automated inspections, they believe that these inspections should be paired with human inspections in order to catch defects that machines couldn’t find, which they say aren’t included in the program.

“[Norfolk Southern]’s proposal was ultimately for the Union to be complicit in [Norfolk Southern]’s effort to reduce legally required minimum track safety standards through supporting their experimental track inspection program without a sensible fail-safe or safety precautions to help ensure trains would not derail,” the letter says. “In other words, [Norfolk Southern]’s proposal was to use [the public’s] safety as their bargaining chip to further pursue their record profits under their cost-cutting business model.”

This proposal, sent by the company as the East Palestine disaster was unfurling, is “unfathomably obtuse and shameless,” the letter concludes. The sick leave issue has been a major focus of union members over the past months, as rail workers got zero days of guaranteed paid sick leave before this year.

The letter was signed by Jonathan B. Long, chairman of the American Rail System Federation (ARSF) of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (BMWED). Attached to the letter was a copy of the proposal that Norfolk Southern sent to the BMWED, which the union did not agree to, Long said.

Long also condemned Norfolk Southern for other profit-seeking moves that have put rail workers in danger and potentially contributed to the Ohio disaster and other crashes.

At the center of the rail industry’s modern profit seeking is a cost-cutting model known as Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR), Long wrote. PSR was adopted by rail companies in the last decade to keep trains running with bare minimum staffing and to push rail infrastructure to — and often over — its limits, in order to line the pockets of rail executives and shareholders. The practice has long been the target of rail worker advocates, and took center stage during last year’s showdown between rail companies and their workers; workers have said that it’s possible the practice contributed to the crash in East Palestine.

Lawmakers must reign in the rail industry’s greed in order to make railroad operations safe for all, the letter said.

“While the world was learning about the horrors occurring in East Palestine on television, [Norfolk Southern] officials assessed the damages and carried out their plans for rebuilding the track structure so that they could get trains moving again,” Long wrote. “After all, if the trains are not moving, the railroads are not making (as much) money, and [Norfolk Southern] is no longer in the business of railroading but instead in the business of making record profits for shareholders and Wall Street.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy