Skip to content Skip to footer

Nearly Two-Thirds of Trump’s First Executive Orders Mirror Project 2025’s Aims

Some roll back previous executive orders issued by Biden. Others reinstate executive orders from Trump’s first term.

President Donald Trump speaks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on January 21, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed a blizzard of executive orders on everything from the environment to immigration — and nearly two thirds of them came straight from Project 2025, the sweeping corporate-backed policy blueprint that Trump lambasted during his 2024 presidential campaign.

Of the 26 formal executive orders Trump signed on Monday, 16 mirrored at least in part proposals from the Heritage Foundation’s 900-page Project 2025 to reshape the federal government, according to an analysis by The Lever.

That includes orders that withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Accords, end Biden’s electric vehicle mandates, and increase oil and gas drilling in Alaska — all proposals that first appeared in Project 2025 months earlier.

In 2024, Democrats linked Trump to Project 2025 during the presidential campaign, noting that more than 140 former Trump administration employees worked on the policy agenda released in April 2023 and that Trump’s running mate, former Ohio Sen. JD Vance, had been boosting the project’s leader. Trump quickly distanced himself from Project 2025, claiming he had “nothing to do with” it and declaring that “some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.”

Many of the new executive orders, however, seem torn straight from the pages of Project 2025. Some roll back previous executive orders issued by former President Joe Biden that aimed to combat climate change or improve diversity and equity in the federal government. Others reinstate executive orders from the first Trump administration.

The executive actions are emblematic of how the Heritage Foundation, a conservative nonprofit think tank, and its corporate sponsors have managed to successfully shape the agenda for a second Trump administration. And with Republicans now controlling both chambers of Congress, Trump will be empowered to put its playbook immediately into practice.

“Project 2025 was the conservative movement’s unapologetic blueprint for building an authoritarian presidency,” said James Goodwin, policy director at the Center for Progressive Reform, a research and advocacy nonprofit focused on climate change, economic issues, and other matters. “And these day-one actions are the Trump administration’s first concrete steps toward realizing that vision.”

Heritage Foundation Helps Fill the Trump Cabinet

Founded in 1973, the Heritage Foundation has been a driving force behind conservative politics for decades. The nonprofit was able to blend together free market capitalism and Christian nationalism, a fusion that came to define the modern-day Republican Party. The foundation is also a dark money juggernaut — it has collected more than $18 million from shadowy Wall Street-backed charities since 2020.

The Heritage Foundation has been preparing for a second Trump presidency for nearly two years — issuing policy blueprints, lining up cabinet picks, and filing more than 50,000 Freedom of Information Act requests to reportedly help find federal employees to purge.

Several architects of Project 2025 are now filling out the Trump administration. Russell Vought, the former vice president of the Heritage Foundation’s sister organization Heritage Action for America — who wrote the Project 2025 chapter on the Executive Office of the President of the United States — was nominated by Trump to lead the Office of Management and Budget, the agency tasked with developing the president’s proposed budget and executing Trump’s agenda. Vought previously headed the agency during the first Trump administration.

Trump nominated Brendan Carr to head the Federal Communications Commission, the same agency that Carr wrote a chapter about for Project 2025. In the chapter, Carr calls to end the censoring of “political viewpoints,” specifically singling out Facebook and YouTube’s censorship policies.

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook’s parent company Meta, recently announced that Facebook would begin promoting political content and end its third-party fact-checking program. Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, YouTube’s parent company, attended Trump’s inauguration.

Project 2025 Parallels

Not every executive order that Trump signed on Monday was referenced in Project 2025. The Heritage Foundation’s manifesto makes no mention of birthright citizenship, the constitutional right that Trump is trying — likely in vain — to rescind. Nor did it recommend declaring a national energy emergency in order to overhaul U.S. energy policy or designating some drug cartels as terrorist groups, both of which Trump has now ordered.

But many of his day-one actions strongly mirror Project 2025’s recommendations.

Take, for instance, Trump’s executive order rescinding the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials. Those officials claimed in 2020 that media reports suggesting a laptop owned by Joe Biden’s son Hunter contained evidence of a pay-to-play scheme were Russian misinformation. Those claims proved to be false, as information on the laptop was used in a federal gun case against Hunter Biden. The laptop and alleged efforts to suppress information about the matter became a major Republican rallying point.

The security-clearance directive explicitly mirrors a Project 2025 directive that mandated that a new administration “should immediately revoke the security clearances of any former directors, deputy directors, or other senior intelligence officials who discuss their work in the press or on social media without prior clearance from the current director.”

The same section of Project 2025 — on the nation’s “Intelligence Community” — recommends that a new administration “direct the [Director of National Intelligence] and the Attorney General… to conduct a further audit of all [intelligence community] equities of past politicization and abuses of intelligence information.”

One of Trump’s executive orders does just that: It requires the Attorney General to review the “weaponization of the Intelligence Community.”

Other executive orders issued by Trump offer additional benefits to the corporate interests that backed the Heritage Foundation and his presidency. Several will roll back climate and environmental rules, as suggested by Project 2025. The moves are a win for oil and gas interests like Koch Industries, the petrochemical giant that funds the Heritage Foundation through its sprawling dark money philanthropic network.

Trump’s executive orders roll back Biden-era limits on oil and gas leasing on federal land, strip energy efficiency standards for household appliances, and eliminate incentives for electric vehicles. These victories for oil and gas interests were proposed in Project 2025, which instructed that a new administration “must immediately roll back Biden’s orders” on climate.

Trump also followed Project 2025’s directives to open up fragile Alaska wilderness to oil and gas drilling — even though the oil industry has been hesitant to take on such a project given the high costs and risks of drilling in far-flung, undeveloped land. In his executive order “Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential,” he reinstated a plan launched during his first administration to allow drilling and development in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, which had received new protections under the Biden administration.

As Project 2025’s authors had written months prior, “Alaska is a special case and deserves immediate action.”

Trump’s first-day executive orders are emblematic of his desire to not only expand the power of the executive branch but also to prime the public for more dramatic changes to come, said Goodwin with the Center for Progressive Reform.

“Like the proverbial frog in boiling water, once this political culture has been introduced to the public, it becomes easier to ratchet up even more extreme exercises of arbitrary power in the future,” he said.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.