Kabul, Afghanistan – The international Special Forces military team that targeted a Kabul office complex on Christmas Eve day thought they were thwarting a holiday season plot to bomb the U.S. Embassy.
But the pre-dawn raid that left two security guards dead found no explosives, no plot and no evidence that the building’s occupants — an Afghan armored car firm that has been working with the U.S. military for nearly a decade — were scheming to attack American diplomats.
Instead, the operation brought the issue of night raids directly into the Afghan capital as the country’s Interior Ministry Sunday accused U.S-led forces of flouting the law and company officials challenged NATO’s version of events.
“I asked them ‘What do we tell the families?’” Nawid Shah Sakhizada, vice president of Tiger International, the Afghan company at the center of the questionable raid, told McClatchy Newspapers on Sunday.
“I told them ‘you did not kill two cows. You killed two human beings,’” said Sakhizada, who was in the office during the confrontation. “We have to answer to the families.”
The U.S.-led military has dramatically expanded night raids such as this one to target Taliban insurgents across Afghanistan.
While NATO commanders say the raids are an essential — and largely successful — tactic, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has consistently questioned the wisdom of the operations.
Since mid-September, Special Forces with the U.S.-led military coalition have conducted at least 1,780 such operations that have ended with the death or arrest of 880 insurgent leaders and capture of more than 2,300 fighters, according to NATO figures.
But it is rare for such raids to take place in Kabul, where Afghan security forces have taken the lead in protecting the city.
On Sunday, Afghanistan’s Interior Ministry accused NATO of flouting an international agreement that requires Afghan security forces to be at the forefront of any such operations in the capital.
The Afghan government immediately disciplined two high-ranking Afghan security officials who helped the U.S.-led coalition carry out the raid without properly advising local police forces.
“The Afghan Interior Ministry is deeply concerned, and this incident should not have happened,” said Zemarai Bashary, the ministry spokesman who announced that a colonel had been fired and a general was suspended for their roles in the raid.
In the pre-dawn hours of Christmas Eve day, a specialized NATO team, joined by 18 Afghan colleagues, converged on the Kabul office complex where they suspected that two vehicles parked outside were packed with explosives in preparation for a Christmastime attack on the U.S. Embassy.
As the military force closed in on the parking lot filled with Tiger International vehicles, the U.S.-led military said that gunmen in the building opened fire. The short firefight ended with two Afghan security guards bleeding to death on the asphalt.
After seeing the NATO version of events, Sakhizada and his company Sunday accused the special forces of firing first when its Afghan guards came out of the building to find out what was going on.
While heading downstairs past a glass window overlooking the parking lot, Sakhizada said the soldiers opened fire and seriously wounded one of his security guards.
Don’t miss a beat – get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.
After forcing the surviving guards to surrender, the NATO-led team scoured the area and came up with no explosives, no car bombs and no evidence that the company was involved in a plan to attack on the U.S. Embassy.
Sakhizada said the soldiers apologized after finding nothing and cautioned the company not to speak to reporters. But company officials refused to remain quiet.
“Saying sorry is not so easy,” said Mohammed Faird Wafah, a friend of Sakhizada family who came to visit the office on Sunday. “Afghan blood is not so cheap. When something like this happens in the center of Kabul, what do you think happens in the more remote provinces?”
On Sunday, NATO officials were unwilling to discuss details of the incident, but said no U.S. forces were involved and categorically rejected the accusation that their soldiers fired first.
“The individuals on the ISAF team who fired their weapons fired after being fired upon,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. John Dorrian, a spokesman for the U.S.-led military coalition. “At that point it’s a self-defense issue.”
Dorrian said Tiger International, which has worked with the U.S. military since it pushed the Taliban government out in 2001, was not the target of the operation. But Tiger International officials said the forces suspected two of the company vehicles were packed with explosives.
Sakhizada called on the U.S. military to pay compensation to the families of the dead and wounded security guards.
Tiger International is part of a larger Afghan company that has more than $10 million in contracts with the U.S. military, said company president Shah Agha Sakhizada.
(Shukoor is a McClatchy special correspondent)
On the Web:
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy