According to a new poll, the overwhelming majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal — and most Americans feel the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear challenges to a highly restrictive abortion law in Texas earlier this month was a mistake.
The most recent Monmouth University poll, released on Monday, found that 62 percent of respondents believe that abortion should always be legal or legal with some limits, while just 35 percent felt it should be illegal with some exceptions or always illegal.
Fifty-four percent of respondents opposed the Supreme Court’s choice to decline to intercede and issue a stay on a Texas law that banned abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. The law allows private citizens to sue anyone who helps a person procure an abortion for sums of up to $10,000.
Seven in 10 Americans (70 percent) disapprove of the Texas law, with only 22 percent saying they support it, the poll found. A greater proportion of respondents (81 percent) said they disapproved of the part of the statute that grants private citizens a reward of up to $10,000 for reporting health care providers who perform abortions.
The survey also showed that most Americans agree that the Supreme Court should not undo abortion protections that were recognized in Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion access in every part of the United States. Only 31 percent of Americans feel that the Court should revisit that historic decision, while 62 percent said they should leave it as is.
The right to access abortion services — a safe and routine medical procedure — shouldn’t be subject to democratic preference. But more than anything else, the Monmouth University poll reveals that the American public is unhappy with the Supreme Court’s conservative bloc majority choosing to let the Texas anti-abortion law remain intact until it is challenged in lower courts. Indeed, data from a separate poll last week from Quinnipiac University found that a plurality of Americans (49 percent) disapproved of the Court’s actions. Only 37 percent gave the institution a positive approval rating.
This is the lowest approval rating the Court has ever seen in the history of the Quinnipiac University poll asking the question.
Those polling numbers come as the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed formal legal briefs urging the Supreme Court to reject arguments that would undo access to abortion services through a different challenge to Roe v. Wade, presented by the state of Mississippi. Earlier this summer, that state’s attorney general, Lynn Fitch, filed her own legal briefs calling for the Court to find the Roe decision unlawful, arguing that it was an “unprincipled” decision that “damaged the democratic process, poisoned our national discourse, [and] plagued the law.”
In addition to the DOJ urging the Court to reject those arguments from Fitch, more than 200 Democratic lawmakers in Congress have also filed a brief to the Supreme Court asking for it to keep Roe intact. Those lawmakers noted that there haven’t been any legal developments warranting the dismantling of abortion protections, save for a change in the Court’s political makeup.
“[T]he only thing that has changed since Casey and Roe were decided is the composition of the Court — which is not a compelling reason to re-examine Roe,” a press release from those Democratic lawmakers said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.