Sana, Yemen – Government forces lobbed mortars from high ground overlooking the Yemeni capital on Tuesday as deadly violence continued for a third day after a brief lull overnight gave way to a dawn chorus of gunfire and shelling, witnesses reported.
At least 10 people were killed in fighting on Tuesday, according to medical officials, putting the death toll since fighting began on Sunday at more than 60 — most of them unarmed protesters caught in the shooting. The deadly mayhem has raised fears that Yemen, the Arab world’s most impoverished country and a haven for Islamic militants, is hurtling toward civil war.
In one episode on Tuesday, two protesters were killed when at least two rockets hit their camp as government security forces battled soldiers who have joined antigovernment protesters in their seven-month-old movement to force President Ali Abdullah Saleh to resign.
For the first time, residents said, government forces dug in above the city fired projectiles toward a house owned by Hamid al-Ahmar, of the Ahmar clan, Mr. Saleh’s biggest tribal rivals. From the city, residents heard a distinctive popping sound as the shells were fired, followed by loud bangs as they exploded.
In the latest spasm of fighting, the conflict has also drawn in Maj. Gen. Ali Mohsin al-Ahmar, who is not related to the Ahmar clan, but whose dissident soldiers from the First Armored Division have been protecting the protesters for months and have been clashing with government forces over the past three days.
Government forces were reported on Tuesday to have shelled the First Armored Division’s base in northwest Sana, while loyalist and antigovernment forces dueled near a protesters’ camp, leaving the pro-democracy forces caught in the crossfire.
In another ominous sign of unraveling, officials closed Sana’s airport on Monday night, one of the few times that has happened since the uprising began in February. By Tuesday morning, there were still no passenger flights at the airport.
Mr. Saleh, the 33-year autocrat and American ally, has been recuperating in Saudi Arabia from an assassination attempt here more than three months ago. He has vowed to return to Yemen, despite his repeated pledges to step down in a negotiated transfer of power.
And while the United States has been working behind the scenes to find a political solution to ease Mr. Saleh out of power, it has been slow to publicly call for him to step down, in contrast to the American position on some other repressive autocrats in the Arab world, most notably in Libya. The American Embassy here issued a statement expressing regret over the casualties in Sana.
“In this tense situation, we call upon all parties to exercise restraint,” the statement said. “In particular, we call on the parties to refrain from actions that provoke further violence. We reject actions that undermine productive efforts under way to achieve a political resolution to the current crisis.”
To some extent, the new violence may be an outcome of a bitter, decades-old rivalry within Yemen’s political elite, one that has largely displaced the popular uprising.
It is notable that the violence broke out just as negotiations were intensifying on a possible political settlement between the governing party and opposition leaders that would, theoretically at least, lead to an early presidential election and possibly bring a sense of stability to the country.
But those negotiations have been conducted without much input from either the Saleh or Ahmar clans or General Ahmar, who all have vested interests in the outcome.
Jamal Benomar, a United Nations special envoy, and a delegation from the Gulf Cooperation Council, a regional group, arrived in Sana on Monday in an effort to expedite the negotiations. “Mediators were finalizing a power transfer plan that will prevent the dominance of both houses of Ahmars and Salehs,” said one Yemeni official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the news media on the subject.
The protesters have opposed any settlement that would preserve much of Yemen’s status quo. To emphasize that point, they tried on Sunday to move beyond the area in central Sana where their tent city, protected by General Ahmar’s soldiers, has become a fixture of their cause. That move may have been the catalyst for the violence.
Another Yemeni official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said General Ahmar called the acting president, Abed Rabbo Mansour al-Hadi, for permission to allow the protesters to demonstrate outside the protected zone. General Ahmar promised he would keep the protests peaceful, the official said, and then — whether intentionally or not — allowed them to attack government soldiers with stones. The soldiers responded with lethal force.
By Monday afternoon, the protest scene was a mixture of chaos and resolve. Motorcycles and ambulances carried mangled bodies away from the center of fighting, a major intersection just south of the site of anti-Saleh sit-ins. But protesters held their ground, despite the risks.
Soldiers from the First Armored Division, commanded by General Ahmar, took over the intersection Sunday evening after clashing with security forces. Protesters erected tents in the intersection, improbably known as Kentucky Square because of a restaurant resembling a KFC that used to be there.
Fighting intensified as rocket-propelled grenades fell near the protesters, and forces loyal to General Ahmar fired artillery at government positions.
Many protesters sat in their tents chewing qat, the leafy green stimulant, as the booms of artillery echoed.
“We are staying here until we die,” said Wuheib al-Youseffy, 32, sitting on a curb with a group of men amid gunfire and artillery explosions. “Why should we be scared? We are used to this.”
Many compared their situation to the fighting in Libya, where antigovernment forces supported by a NATO bombing campaign ended the rule of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi last month.
“The international community isn’t doing anything here,” said one protester, Awad Mansour, 26. “Look at Libya: they froze their assets, they helped the rebels, and for us, they don’t do anything.”
Alan Cowell contributed reporting from Paris and Robert F. Worth from New York.
The article “Mortars Fall on Yemeni Capital as Battles Continue,” originally appeared in The New York Times.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.