Skip to content Skip to footer

Mississippi State Senate Passes Anti-Immigration Law

There’s a new SB 1070 on the block, and this one comes out of Mississippi. On Tuesday the Mississippi State Senate passed SB 2179, a measure that allows law enforcement officers to check a person’s immigration status during a traffic stop or while enforcing other laws. In doing so the state became the first legislature to make good on its talk of passing a law that mimics Arizona’s SB 1070.

There’s a new SB 1070 on the block, and this one comes out of Mississippi. On Tuesday the Mississippi State Senate passed SB 2179, a measure that allows law enforcement officers to check a person’s immigration status during a traffic stop or while enforcing other laws. In doing so the state became the first legislature to make good on its talk of passing a law that mimics Arizona’s SB 1070.

SB 2179’s chief backer is Sen. Joey Fillingane, a Republican in a majority Democrat chamber.

The Clarion-Ledger reports that Fillingane considers SB 2179 an improvement over SB 1070 because law enforcement officers are allowed to inquire about a person’s status only while in the course of enforcing other laws, making such a check a “secondary status.”

“We did not want anyone to go out and start picking on or racial profiling people,” Fillingane told the paper.

The forces against independent journalism are growing. Help Truthout keep up the fight against ignorance and regression! Support us here.

SB 1070 allows for a law enforcement official to inquire about a person’s status in the course of “any lawful stop, detention or arrest…in the enforcement of any other law or ordinance of a county, city or town or this state where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien and is unlawfully present in the United States.” SB 2179 allows law enforcement officers to stop any person who is stopped for violating traffic laws.

Mississippi’s SB 2179 also makes it a state crime to be caught without immigration papers and allows law enforcement to arrest, “without warrant,” a person “reasonably believed” to be in the country without papers.

The bill now moves on to the House, where it must be voted on to get out of committee. All eyes are on Gov. Haley Barbour, who last year said that such anti-immigration laws were worthwhile, but added that immigrants had contributed a great deal to his state.

“I don’t think there’s any question that we had a tremendous number of people come in, and I have no doubt some of them weren’t here legally,” Barbour said, Fox News Latino reported. “I don’t know where we’d have been without them.”

Barbour will choose his words carefully; he’s being termed out and is widely expected to have presidential aspirations.

Mississippi is also talking about introducing other anti-immigration laws, like one that require anyone who has a state driver’s license to speak English, or a law that would mandate state documents only be available in English.

“Latinos are the new target,” Mississippi Immigrants Rights Alliance executive director Bill Chandler told the Clarion-Ledger last week. “Many of these bills are based on false perception.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.