Surviving members of the Little Rock Nine, a group of students who faced extreme harassment and threats of violence for integrating Little Rock Central High School in 1957, have spoken out against Arkansas education officials who decided last week not to recognize an Advanced Placement (AP) course on Black history.
Earlier this month, Arkansas Department of Education officials informed school districts in the state that offered the course — including in Little Rock — that students may not be permitted to use the college-level course in their counting of credits that are necessary to graduate from high school. Officials claimed their decision was based on the fact that the course, which is produced by the company the College Board, has a “pilot” status, and said that the course could violate both state law and an executive order from Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) that forbids the teaching of subjects that supposedly push implicit bias.
It’s unclear how the state came to the conclusion that the course may teach implicit bias. Officials have cited similar unfounded claims to block the teaching of Black history elsewhere in the U.S., largely to appease right-wing lawmakers and white conservatives who are opposed to lessons about racism in U.S. history.
AP African American Studies, the course in question, has been in development for over a decade, the College Board says on its website. The curriculum “[draws] from the expertise and experience of college faculty and teachers across the country…to offer high school students an evidence-based introduction to African American studies,” through the fields of “literature, the arts and humanities, political science, geography, and science.”
In the fall of 1957, three years after the Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” in education was unconstitutional, nine Black students sought to integrate Little Rock High School. For weeks, the students were blocked from doing so by an angry white mob and the National Guard, which had been called by then-Gov. Orval Faubus to prevent the students from entering the school. In late September of that year, President Dwight Eisenhower finally federalized the National Guard and sent the U.S. Army to escort the students to the school. White residents continued to harass members of the Little Rock Nine, as they came to be known, for weeks after.
Some surviving members of the Little Rock Nine criticized the decision by the Arkansas Department of Education on NBC News, calling it a deliberate, far right attempt to limit the teaching of factual events.
“I think the attempts to erase history is working for the Republican Party. They have some boogeymen that are really popular with their supporters,” said Elizabeth Eckford, a member of the Little Rock Nine.
Terrence Roberts, another member of the Little Rock Nine, also denounced the decision, saying that at a “bare minimum” there shouldn’t be “laws restricting [students’] ability to learn” what happened in the U.S. during the Civil Rights era.
Roberts added that attempts to ban lessons on Black history are “ridiculous.”
“I know there are voices pushing back. The question is, will they be successful?” Roberts said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.